Schroedinger's cat will always land on its feet ... But not if it doesn't exist.

Well, yes and no, Capfka.

"What is not" could be embedded in Bohm's "implicate" order, in which case the cat is always on its feet and only "lands" when we actually see it.

Someone who understands Bohm [far more than I ever will] explains:

"In Bohm's view, all the separate objects, entities, structures, and events in the visible or explicate world around us are relatively autonomous, stable, and temporary "subtotalities" derived from a deeper, implicate order of unbroken wholeness."