"...text that is deemed worthy of serious study..."

- and -

somewhere, at the boundary between "what is", and "what is not" [just as we deciphered at the boundary between evaporation and condensation], Schroedinger's cat will always land on its feet.

Not that I'd personally question anything's "worthiness of study" (especially the "navel of the universe"), nor would I challenge 'nature' by ever buttering the toast tied to the feet of Schroedinger's cat and hang it by the tail over a bottomless pit, but to insinuate that there may not be much call for so called "talmudic metaphors" (even without its capitilization) seems to be coming from a gestalt of surrealism... not that there's anything *wrong with that.

much need for, however, I would contemplate directly.