I searched the site for this, b/c it seemed a likely YART, but no luck.

Do we have a list of words that don't mean what their etymologies suggest?

Context - without intending to debate, per se, I brought up the fact that there is disagreement about what the term 'atheism' means. However, I was aware that there would likely be disagreement. Most people who discuss these things will simply say, "My definition is the only correct definition and here are my sources. All other definitions are bogus."

Once again, I don't want to start a debate here. I don't want to argue about the existence of god or who believes what. For the sake of non-argument, let's just say that whatever you as a reader believe about god, that I believe the exact same thing.

Frankly, I don't really give a rat's ass what words mean - well, more like I don't care to define the words myself. I mostly just infer meaning from other people's usages. It seems to me that I'm just reporting the obvious.

What I'd like to know is:

1a) From the POV of people who do have an interest in definitions, do I have a point?

1b) If I do have a point, what are some examples of (other) words whose meanings don't jibe with their etymologies. I'm particularly interested in words whose meanings actually contradict their etymologies, but a stark contrast would be sufficient.

1c) Do you think the word "atheism" should be enumerated among that set?


2) I've attempted to make this point on numerous occasions with both atheists and nonatheists, but it usually falls on blind eyes. Is there a clearer way to say this than what I've done?


3) Citations would be good, but it would be better if I could get at least a few non-web citations.

Please, say whatever you think needs to be said. I WON'T RESPOND about what I believe, but only read (or clarify if requested). Will be going away for a week or so and may not see all responses immediately, but *really* look forward to seeing opinions - even if it's just to say I'm screwed in the head.

For the life of me, my observation seems so obvious as to be unworthy of mention, were it not for the fact that so many disagree with it.

thanks,
k


-------
For reference --


What I said:

The traditional view is
a) an atheist is someone who disbelieves in god.
b) an agnostic is someone who withholds judgement.


What the other person said:

Actually this is false. The common misconception is the above but this
is not the traditional view. Agnosticism is a position on the
availability of knowledge about god.It is the belief that said knowledge
is inherently unattainable. It says nothing about belief. Theism and
atheism are statements about belief in gods. Atheism, simply put, is a
lack of belief in a god or gods. You can be an agnostic atheist or an
agnostic theist. I have known both.



What I said:

The view of a great many people who call themselves atheists is this:
Anyone who does not actively believe in a god is an atheist (insisting -
stupidly in my opinion - that words have to mean what their etymologies
suggest).


What the other person said:

Rejecting this valid definition of atheism is usually done because of a
bias against the word itself. It literally means non-theist. Everyone is
either a theist or an atheist. It is a true binary pairing, your opinion
of my intellect notwithstanding.



k