I didn't follow this one until I saw the thread and I've done some reading up. My view:

(a) The lady was sick. Quite genuinely and organically sick.
(b) The lady was ill-educated.
(c) The lady was unsupported by the social agencies.
(d) The lady was religious. Combined with (a) and (b), you're into deadly territory already.
(e) The lady's husband, for whatever reason, is a twat.
(f) The lady made the fatal error (see (a), (b), (c) and (d) above) of living in Texas.
(g) The juries and judges in Texas all seem to suffer from a surfeit of (b) and (d).
(h) As a result of (g) there appears to be no recognition that (a) exists and (d) is assumed to make up for any apparent symptoms which elsewhere would lead to the conclusion of (a).

The rest just appears to follow on from (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f) and (g), with the consequences engendered by (h) to add to it all ...

All of you crusaders out there waiting to take offence, note that this is just my view. Please. Really.



The idiot also known as Capfka ...