<When the toad hops up with Could they be remiss with their expedience, mav-arch? in a hopeless attempt to confuse the issue, does he understand the word cheat?>

Does our shaman of dubious entity understand that when he equates toad with the image of a cheat he is bound to libel and raise the ire of our froggy, new-fatherhood friend? right, Hyla?

And doesn't it seem that his phrase DONG! That's a definite full-stop, twice over. is the first non-question so brazenly posted in violation of the rules? And wasn't he really just pricking his own balloon?
And with this is there any reason I should not wholeheartedly rest my case? And will my said-accuser ever address the arch-Sybilhood of his appearances on this board, or will he just continue to hide behind the cactus flower?