Faldage says, "... the simple answer YES"

I agree, it could be read both ways. If it was written that way on purpose, bravo to the writer. It's my understanding the big book was written to be non-denominational, to attract a larger group of people it's less specific, allowing individuals the opportunity to fit their personal beliefs inside it's teachings. You are at the mercy of your own interpretation.
That's if we're going to believe it was done on purpose and not assume it's faulty craftsmanship.