OK grapho, me and etoin compareed our notes and found your aside amusing and self-congradulating but sadly so; a totally unnecessary diversion from the central point, you know, like a slippery lawyer's argument when he argues to divert rather than address the lack of evidence in his flimsy case.

Besides, no one knows for sure who Shakspere was. Maybe Shakspare was a woman, just like the Mona Lisa, who, as we know today, was a man.