Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
#99370 03/25/03 05:08 PM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
W
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
I'm just curious about how you all might interpret this statement about adolescence (here defined as roughly between 12 and 20 years of age):

"Period of life from puberty to adulthood (roughly ages 12-20) characterized by...a progression from concrete to abstract thought." Britannica

I've omitted information about other indicators of adolescence. Here I'm more interested in what you categorize as strictly concrete and strictly abstract thought, especially as might be evidenced in the developing thought processes of adolescents.

Oh, and even if not applied to adolescents, what would you immediately categorize as concrete thoughts and abstract ones?


Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 555
M
addict
Offline
addict
M
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 555
WW, your title sent a chill down my spine! You see, I wrote the exact same sentence in a letter a year back or so to a friend and I was startled when I saw it up on Q&A. Cyber worlds sometimes unnerve me. Like Jackie once asked in anxious bewilderment, 'where does it all go'?

To give you some cotext without delving into protracted details; I was referring in that note, to my worry about imbuing what was in all probability an abstract notion with concrete sentiment.

To my mind, anything concrete is tangible and has a core of reality and fact in it. Whilst abstract, has only the shape of possibility; its core is, the burden of proof. It is the germ of an idea or thought that has not been put through the test.



Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
W
wwh Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
It is tempting for adolescents to be overconfident about the extent of their knowledge. I remember a quotation from Mark Twain to the effect that when he was fifteen, his old man was so stupid, he caould hardly stand him But when he was twenty, he was amazed at how much the old guy had learned in five years.


Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 618
D
addict
Offline
addict
D
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 618
I think most of the experts in whatever-field-this-would-be (probably child psychology) would use an age bracket 2-4 years lower. Abstract thought develops parallel to the realisation that the universe is not you-centric. A recent study (in The Lancet maybe - I think we discussed it here somewhere) showed that perception of sarcasm is not complete until well into the teenage years. Concrete versus abstract thought would be tested by use and understanding of sarcasm and metaphor, and the ability to explain proverbs.

That was a whole lot of random information. I can add more (or PM) if anyone wants more info, of which I have quite a bit given that this is my planned specialisation. One day.

And what's with the medical questions today WW?


Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Z
Zed Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Z
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Back when most people had heard of them we used to use proverbs to assess concrete vs abstract thinking after brain injury. eg "What does it mean when I say 'A rolling stone gathers no moss"? A concrete response would be "the moss gets scraped off when the rock moves. More abstract would be "If you don't stick to one job you'll never get rich." or "New experiences keep you from getting stagnant." The meaning was less important than their ability to move from the concept of the physical object to using it to represent a non-physical concept. It was not unusual for someone familiar with the abstract meaning prior to a brain injury to be unable to make that move after.
We don't use them much now not because people are more concrete (????) but because they aren't haven't heard of proverbs.


Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
W
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
DocC:

The question about how readers here distinguish concrete from abstract thoughts is simply one of curiosity. I'm interested in reading how we define that line that separates the two. I expect there to be a gray area.

But the question on the other thread about pneumonia came from researching pneumonia on the internet. I thought I might have pneumonia, self-diagnosed it, and then became interested in some of what I was reading about it, particularly nursing home pneumonia. [My doctor is treating me for acute bronchitis, but I still think I have pneumonia. ]

Edit: Zed, I just read what you just posted about the use of proverb interpretation to help determine brain injury--very interesting!


Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Off the top of my head--I would say that concrete thought applies to things that can be seen, heard, touched, smelled, or tasted. Can be unequivocally demonstrated, one way or another. Abstract is everything else.


Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,204
R
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
R
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,204
If I write a treatise on the effects of mixing cement, sand and gravel with water, that's concrete.
If someone makes a short précis of the treatise, that's an abstract.



Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,204
R
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
R
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,204
.... we used to use proverbs to assess concrete vs abstract thinking ....

That's very interesting, Zed.
I remember that when I was quite young (6 or 8 yrs old, I guess) I used to love Æsop's Fables, and the concrete examples of the stories helped me to develop an understanding of the abstract concepts of the "moral" to each story.
These days, I do find Æsop more than a little tedious - I no longer need the example to comprehend the message of the moral.
And, to me, the difference between the concrete and abstract is well summed up by the story and the moral in those tales.


#99379 03/26/03 04:18 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
Not that I'm complaining, but, why is going from concrete to abstract thought considered 'progress'?




Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,350
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
1 members (A C Bowden), 904 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,549
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,918
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5