Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: Second Amendment Question #70542
05/21/02 11:40 PM
05/21/02 11:40 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 200
A
AphonicRants Offline
enthusiast
AphonicRants  Offline
enthusiast
A
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 200
Somehow, milum always leaves me smilin'.


Re: Second Amendment Question #70543
05/22/02 08:47 PM
05/22/02 08:47 PM
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,467
Marion NC
TEd Remington Offline
Carpal Tunnel
TEd Remington  Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,467
Marion NC
WW:

I've always felt the Second Amendment could not be interpreted. Here's the text of a letter I wrote to several newspapers a couple of years ago, none of hwich chose to publish it.

>
> The first seven words of our Constituion are "We the People of the United
> States." We the people should decide this issue once and for all through the
> political process. Since we do not have the capacity to present this or any
> other issue directly to the people for a national referendum, I propose the
> following amendment to the Constitution.
>
> It preserves the right to bear arms in defense of our country and the
> individual states, reserves to the individual states the power to regulate
> the ownership of arms, and specifically grants to Congress the right to
> regulate or prohibit interstate shipments or importation of arms and
> ammunition. It also requires that the amendment be ratified by state
> Conventions rather than by the legislatures of the individual states. This
> is the closest we can come under our system of government to a national
> referendum on gun control.
>
> We have a national election coming up in less than eight months. We the
> people need to ask of the candidates running this fall whether they support
> this proposed amendment and we the people need to vote accordingly. We the
> people need to make our voices heard.
>
> Proposed amendment:
>
> Section 1. The second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United
> States is hereby repealed.
>
> Section 2. A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of the
> United States, the right to bear arms in defense of the United States or of
> the several States shall not be infringed.
>
> Section 3. The power to regulate keeping of arms by individual residents is
> reserved exclusively to the States respectively, except that Congress may
> prohibit or regulate the interstate transportation of arms and ammunition and
> may prohibit or regulate the importation of arms and ammunition into the
> United States.
>
> Section 4. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been
> ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by Conventions of three-fourths
> of the several States within fifteen years from the date of its submission to
> the States by the Congress.

If the conventions of the states vote this up, it becomes aprt of the Constitution, otherwise it ends up where the ERA amendment is, in the trash barrel. But at least we will have as close as we can get to the will of the people.

TEd




TEd
. #70544
05/22/02 08:54 PM
05/22/02 08:54 PM
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,409
M
Max Quordlepleen Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Max Quordlepleen  Offline
Carpal Tunnel
M
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,409

Re: Commas #70545
05/23/02 04:35 PM
05/23/02 04:35 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692
UK
D
dxb Offline
Pooh-Bah
dxb  Offline
Pooh-Bah
D
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692
UK
Is it possible that he could be telling someone named Martha that he was talking to his wife? Or am I missing the obvious?


Re: Commas #70546
05/23/02 04:58 PM
05/23/02 04:58 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Faldage Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Faldage  Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
missing the obvious

If he were telling someone named Martha that he had been talking to his wife, there *would be a pause in his speech and there would be a comma in either the grammatical or rhetorical styles of comma use.


Re: Commas #70547
05/23/02 05:17 PM
05/23/02 05:17 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692
UK
D
dxb Offline
Pooh-Bah
dxb  Offline
Pooh-Bah
D
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692
UK
Ah, yes. Thank you.


Re: Second Amendment Question #70548
05/23/02 06:33 PM
05/23/02 06:33 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,146
Northamptonshire, England
Capital Kiwi Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Capital Kiwi  Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,146
Northamptonshire, England
MaxQ repeats his usual response to a post by Milum, to wit: Huh?

To wit, me too. But Milum at least saw that I wasn't trying to tell the Americans how to live their lives.





The idiot also known as Capfka ...
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  Jackie 

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,883
Posts224,830
Members9,056
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Nikki1221, Veezkneez, LOC, Luna, wordie
9056 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 229 guests, and 3 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
LOC 1
Top Posters(All Time)
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,538
LukeJavan8 9,157
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2018 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1.1
(Release build 20180111)
Page Time: 0.017s Queries: 13 (0.004s) Memory: 3.1517 MB (Peak: 3.3101 MB) Zlib disabled. Server Time: 2018-06-20 20:52:00 UTC