Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
#64360 04/08/02 01:02 AM
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,409
M
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
M
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,409

#64361 04/08/02 02:16 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 477
H
hev Offline
addict
Offline
addict
H
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 477
For all the new-ish people, and even some of you old-ish people don't forget to read the Helpful Hints & FAQ post in this forum, or go to Max's hints page: http://maxqnz.com/Hints.html

[Toddling-off-to-go-look-there-myself-e]

Hev

#64362 04/08/02 12:55 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
And for those who read only in threaded mode:

http://makeashorterlink.com

to give you links to URLs that are wider than the page width. In threaded mode the wide links affect only the post in which they are found; in flat mode they affect the whole page of posts requiring the reader to scroll horizontally at each line to read the post. It becomes rather tiresome rather quickly.


#64363 04/08/02 03:42 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,439
W
wow Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,439
wide links ...in flat mode affect the whole page of posts requiring the reader to scroll horizontally at each line to read the post. It becomes rather tiresome rather quickly

To say nothing about nauseous-making ... wide posts are also extremely difficult for anyone with vision problems.
You kind attention to the shorterlink suggestion is sought, and much appreciated.
Thank you.


Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
Is there an agreed limit as to what qualifies as "too wide of a link" ? I thought that the standard wordsmith post link that has been truncated after the "Number=XXXXX" was ok for all.

"Make a shorter link" is a web tracking program, and I'm not inclined to use it. If I get a link that is too long, to insure it doesn't affect adversley, I'll leave it as text and potential visitors can open a new browser window then cut and paste into the address line!


Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,981
J
jmh Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
J
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,981
Is there an agreed limit as to what qualifies as "too wide of a link" ?

Yes, is there? It's a little trick for us big screen types to imagine what it is like in the tiny screen world out there - are you talking Mackintosh Classic size or teeny weeny palmtop? A maximum character length would be useful. I haven't seen anything go wide for ages, so PM me if I'm the guilty party!

PS Just back from scorching holiday in the Highlands and Islands - heaven on earth, shimmering blue seas and very rarely seen (at least by me) tops of mountains. Can't hand around, too busy sunbathing.


#64366 04/10/02 11:12 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757
M
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
M
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757
hello mein lieblings :) Just getting my new computer set up, and (in doubtless hopeless attempt to catch up on several thou posts since last here) I am being inhibited by failure to load some threads with an alert that the "mime header is too long". I vaguely recall someone having a solution to this issue in another lifetime - can anyone advise?

~ the actual script in the window is:
<Server Error
The following error occurred:
The server response MIME header is too long.>


#64367 04/10/02 11:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 477
H
hev Offline
addict
Offline
addict
H
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 477
can anyone advise?

Nope - but I do feel like I have to say WELCOME back! Hope some of those other techies out there can give you the help you need!

My favourite tech support quote, from DilbertŪ: "Welcome to Dogbert's technical support line. How may I ignore you?"

Hev

#64368 04/10/02 11:44 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Howdy, mav! Good to see ya back!

Your Happy Epeolatrist!

#64369 04/11/02 12:11 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
yes, dear aunty mav.. i just said that to get Jackie's dander up.-- everyone know, it Dear Mr. Bingley for me!its wonderful to have you back.


#64370 04/11/02 12:23 AM
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,409
M
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
M
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,409

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
K
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
K
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
I leave it to others to judge whether Max's reference to me was mature comment or was a preevish throw-in.

Ding!

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Ding!

Dong!


#64373 04/11/02 01:18 AM
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,409
M
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
M
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,409

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,636
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,636
Just goes to show you, folks, that you don't need swearing to be abusive. Ken, why don't you give it a rest. We are so tired of you always pointing your finger, jumping up and down and yelling "See...Seee...They're picking on me again", when, in fact, you will edit your posts to look like you have said nothing abrasive, you will take what other people say out of context and point to it as bullying,...I could go on. It really is a shame because you have been a great poster until you decided you must also be God of the Board. BTW, haremgirls, I used to be his friend too, but I have had enough of his rudeness and bullying. I am not the only one that feels this way. What I will do is quote you, Ken.

I am not saying he is wrong, nor am I saying he is right. I simply feel that this Board is not the place to be voicing these thoughts or to vent so much.
I think that one of the reasons that this Board thrives with so many divergent personalities is that we have, by and large, decided to keep our pet hates to ourselves, unless they are word-related. I hope that everybody will see the advantages of continuing such a practice.




Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
K
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
K
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
Hi, Connie!

Actually, I think that language was my quotation of Max, so let's give him the credit.

And Connie, I think you'll find I've been reasonably consistent about objecting to rude language, whether it is directed at me or at others. If you would wish the responses to be fewer, perhaps you should wish the rudenesses to be fewer. Indeed, if you were to look at some of the more extreme recent threads you will find that I let quite a bit go without response. [cites available by PM if you wish.]

[Edit, 4 minutes later: Connie, would you please be so good as to PM me an example of my supposed "rudeness and bullying" on this board?]

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,636
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,636
On February 21, 2002, Keiva informed me that he was going to "nuke" the board and it was not open to discussion. I guess that is what he is doing now. I am very disappointed in you, Ken.


Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
K
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
K
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
Did I, CP? If so, why did I do nothing of the sort for over a month?


Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,636
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,636
February 21, 2002
And I quote:

Ken says:
4) nuke is pending.
Connie says:
I ask you please not to.
Ken says:
5) that's warning.
This is not offered to you for discussion. I will do whatever seems to me right.
Ken says:
nothing will be done precippitously or imminently.


Is that citation enough? Or do you want more?


Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
K
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
K
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
I think that with your last quoted sentence you've proven MY point, Connie, not yours. I had hoped to prod you into taking an active role as a peacemaker, but the hope was unavailing.


Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
Oh connie, look at this I had hoped to prod you into taking an active role as a peacemaker, but the hope was unavailing.

Sound to me, like some one held a gun to your head, said do as i say, or it will all be your fault. But hey that's him being nice. after all, this person decide they knew best, and as self appointed judge jury and exicutioner, the want you to be one of the hang men.

guess you and are lucky, we only got nice message from this person. I am glad you keep yours, unfortunately, i trash mail from some people, unopened. and i did a clean out a few weeks ago, and deleted the old posts as well.

any one is entitled to hold any opinion of other posters. but some new members, might want to ask themselves, why is it, that 30 or so regular posters, who can't agree on anything else, all manage to agree that one person is a disruptive influence.

it could be all 30 of us are wrong, and the 10 or so newer poster are right, but, at one point, i had the same opinion as the new posters. and no one on this board sent me warnings, or tried to poison my opinion, (in fact, the other has occured, some tried to convince me to give the guy one more chance.) I did sent several PM, when upset, that could be considered attempts at poisoning someone views. that person called me on, i stopped, and apologied, and we now have an OK relationship.


Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
I think that with your last quoted sentence you've proven MY point, Connie, not yours.

...and for an encore goes on to prove that black is white, and gets himself killed on the next zebra crossing


Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
K
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
K
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
might ask themselves why is it, that 30 or so regular posters all manage to agree that one person is a disruptive influence.

-- or might ask themselves why it is that said regular members are unwilling or unable to cite factual support for their views.
-- or might ask themselves what the views would be of previous members who, having received nastiness*, are not longer with us or are posting far less than before.

Have we a selected sample, Helen, one from which some members have driven out or cowed the voices that might disagree with you? That's a factual question, on which you and I may reach differing conclusions -- but would you agree that it's a question that merits mature consideration?

PS: dear Helen, would that we had as many as 30 regular posters.



Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,156
B
old hand
Offline
old hand
B
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,156

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,094
J
old hand
Offline
old hand
J
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,094
would that we had as many as 30 regular posters.

This didn't take any more than 5 minutes:

1 myself
2 Jackie
3 tsuwm
4 Max Q
5 CK
6 Faldage
7 AnnaS
8 of troy
9 wow
10 wwh
11 RubarbCommando
12 jmh
13 belM
14 Bingley
15 W'ON
16 Bean
17 maverick
18 consuelo
19 Ted Remington
20 caradea
21 hev
22 musick
23 Sparteye
24 stales
25 The Fallable Fiend
26 Wordwind
27 Flatlander
28 belligerentyouth
29 Fiberbabe
30 GallantTed

and that's not even complete.


Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
K
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
K
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
What the hell is it with you and "factual support"? Try to follow this sequence of events: You post something. It pisses me off.

Bean, I simply am asking what it is that I said that is in anyway improper, and ought reasonably to "piss you off".

Surely you don't believe that when you (or anyone else) calls me (or anyone else) names, I am not entitled to disagree, provided I disagree politely? I would think that's that's an elementary principle of rational discussion -- please correct me if I'm wrong on that -- and I simply ask you where IYHO I violated it.

What do you think we have, a little Keiva-diary listing all the times you've annoyed us?
Bean, if you have a good reason for being annoyed -- as opposed to personal animus -- then how difficult could it be to LIU?

[Edit: Jazzo, am sending you a PM.]



#64386 04/11/02 06:12 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757
M
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
M
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757
Cheers, mate.

Thanks for the warm welcome Max, and for all who have pm'd - hope I have nearly replied to all now, but if not I'll do a complete public display of the private correspondence at the weekend ;)

The strange aberrations over unopenable threads continues with other variations thrown in as well – can it really be cookies in a new Windows XP installation?! Ugh. Oh, btw, it’s interesting how different the appearance of this site is on this posh little TFT monitor – colo(u)r rendition seems quite markedly changed, but hey, it’s probably still some cranky corners of this mountain of new software I am struggling to come to terms with!

Since, as you note, I seem to have stepped back in time to another lawyer-inspired flame war, can I just share the thought with everyone that like a cocktail party, the only way out is to ignore the guest you find offensive. Or have you all struggled to do that and it *still goes on and on, through the thousands of posts I have not yet read!?



#64387 04/11/02 07:34 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,146
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,146
Welcome back Mav. Hope your flak jacket, helmet and gas mask are in good order. There's shrapnel and a foul smell in I&A these days ...



The idiot also known as Capfka ...
#64388 04/11/02 08:17 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
welcome back, mav! amazing about the unopenable threads ~ perhaps you should search the treeware for reference to an autorunning IMG* filter... and then send me the applicable .exe and .dlls so that i can install it once again enjoy the board.

re your cocktail party reference, just put it into this light:

pretend the "guest" in question has peed in the punchbowl.




*supply your own acronym; there're plenty that fit


#64389 04/26/02 01:40 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
K
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
K
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
Connie, a quiet reply to you. I wouldn't bring this up, but for the fact that mav brought it up in his "fastuous git" thread.

You'll recall that on February 19 a rather heavy barrage of f-bombs rained upon my head (spammer thread). By your own statement, the conversation you quote was two days later; the later cannot be the cause or justification of the earlier. Non post hoc, ergo non proper hoc.

In that context, what you quote is pretty clear. I was understandable hurt and offended by the f-bombs, but I had the good sense to talk out my anger with a purported friend, instead of putting it on the board. Wouldn't you say that's a remarkably restrained attitude -- and that it contrasts with those who did vent their anger on the board?

[Aside: Connie, don't you recall that we had agreed months previously, in our conversations, that all we talked about -- your hurts, quite as much as mine -- would be strictly confidential?]


#64390 04/26/02 09:27 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,636
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,636
Let go of my hair, you are hurting my neck. And get your face out of my face. I don't care how quietly you say you are replying, your reply would have better been sent by PM and you know it. Jackie, here's another thread it seems needs a lock on it. Sorry to subject you to this, folks.


#64391 04/26/02 09:30 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A
i love ya, connie =)

[clap e]


Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
K
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
K
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
Connie, you know full well that I have sent you several notes, to which you refused to reply. It is grossly misleading to berate me for not communicating with you by PM.

And since you made your charge publicly (in red, no less), indeed without preceding it by PM, how can you object that I want the same public that heard you to hear my response? Is your notion that you are entitled to speak, but I am not entitled to respond?

A bit more temperate please, gal.

#64393 04/26/02 11:02 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,891
B
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
B
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,891
Post deleted by me. I sent it off to Connie directly.

I'm sorry I answered in this thread. I wanted to console a friend and I responded incorrectly. Not incorrectly as to the content of my response, but incorrectly because I did not consider the fact that it would generate a response from sombody I have publicly said I did not wish to deal with anymore.

Please excuse me everybody.

#64394 04/26/02 11:14 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
K
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
K
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
bel, I'd ask that you read a bit more carefully.

First, you are ignoring all of my comment other than the white "aside". That is not the meat of the matter.

But as to that side point: I've been quite clear on that my position is that communications are not automatically privileged, merely because the sender wants them to be. That does not bar the recipient from agreeing to confidentiality -- and when the recipient has made that agreement, he or she durn well ought to honor it.

Indeed, bel, I as a lawyer could be severely censured if I broke a confidentiality agreement. I take such things seriously, as part of my professional obligations, and I do not think they should be trivialized.

#64395 04/26/02 11:25 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757
M
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
M
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757
Connie, your words were strong and heartening - good on you "gal" ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

Whatever is said, the dog returns to his sick. Some might think this is a sign not just of abusive behaviour but of serious mental illness.

I will repeat publicly what I have already said to the administrator privately: the only issue is how many people will desert this board due to the malicious and foul pollution in the cocktail, before the inevitable ban on the perpetrator is put into effect.


Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
K
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
K
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
Maverick, I see lots of colorful words in your post, but I am unable to find a single factual claim or reasoned argument to which to respond.

On what ground to you think I should be "banned"? Can you point to anything I have done in this discussion other than simply respond, temperately, to what Connie et al. had to say? Is your notion that responses and responders with which you disagree should be censored or banned?

Edit: mav, have you not been a strong opponent of censorship, as I recall (though I did not yet LIU), when your own remarks were challenged?

#64397 04/27/02 01:07 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
what exactly is s/h/itŪ & clones wanting to achieve here?


#64398 04/29/02 12:19 AM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 184
E
member
Offline
member
E
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 184

#64399 04/29/02 02:34 AM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 170
S
member
Offline
member
S
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 170

#64400 04/29/02 08:35 AM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 679
R
addict
Offline
addict
R
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 679
I do wish to
say that I joined this board because Keiva highly recommended it, and because he spoke highly of you all.
Keiva is a passionate individual - and it seems he may have simply had his buttons pushed beyond his limit.


Really? Well this should open your eyes. I have been staying away from the board for a while for various reasons but an email received this morning awakened me to the latest problems on the board. As much as I abhor and protest against the publication of personal messages and email I have decided to publish, in full, a complete, unabridged and unsolicited PM I received from Keiva after a particularly nasty incident last August. I have never PM'd Keiva nor have I ever responded to him and yet he comes up with the following flaming words of his own accord. That, my dears, is a true sign of an irrational mind and one which is, if only in my humble opinion, in need of some serious mental help. Clearly he was intent only on destroying the board from day 1 and he has been touting for potential apprentices ever since. He seems, clearly, to have found some over the past few months.

All emphasis is as it was in the original PM.

Quote begins:

Rubrick, don't leave just yet.
I'm newer than you -- and I agree with you in spades -- and I intend to give them hell!

Work with me -- or at least, watch, grin, and see what develops.

Please send me a PM, to let me know you got this before you departed into the mists.

End quote.

Nobody was pushing his buttons back in late August when he sent me this.

I come here for words, fun and interaction with a knowledgeable, intelligent international community. I certainly didn't come here to bash others on the board but if you want to call me a Keiva-basher, then so be it. However, by supplying what Mr. Keiva values so highly, I think the facts speak for themselves.

FYI, I never perceive anyone as being a clone of anyone else on the board. We may all be influenced by others but I believe the individuality still remains. However, I must say that I, amongst many, have had quite enough of the distructive methods of Keiva and do not wish to view his hurtful, spiteful, belligerent words on this forum again.


#64401 04/29/02 10:07 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Let's stop this now, please.


#64402 04/29/02 12:56 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 184
E
member
Offline
member
E
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 184

#64403 04/29/02 04:28 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
It is only fair
Well, I had asked that the going back and forth be stopped, and I see that the least-restrictive method has not worked. As I wrote to someone earlier today, my style has always been to make suggestions, thus giving people the power to decide on their own what to do. Like most doctors try (I think) to do with prescriptions, I want to start with the lightest, least-invasive technique first, and only get more serious if that fails. I am still very reluctant to take steps than only an administrator can take, so I will ask once again that this be stopped.
I will, however, respond, since I am making a post anyway. As I posted before, I will do my best to do what Anu has asked me to do: return this board to the kind and gentle place it used to be. And if, in that attempt, I am unfair, then so be it. I do indeed take this job very seriously, and will carry it out to the best of my ability despite the rather high personal cost. Anu has indicated that he trusts my judgment in this matter.



#64404 04/29/02 04:45 PM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 679
R
addict
Offline
addict
R
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 679
Quotes on this board, in the past, have been taken out of context

I'm newer than you -- and I agree with you in spades -- and I intend to give them hell!

Work with me -- or at least, watch, grin, and see what develops.

The context is very clear and I have not misquoted. What more facts do you need?!


#64405 04/29/02 05:11 PM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 679
R
addict
Offline
addict
R
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 679
By now everyone must know that you have banned Keiva from this site

FYI I did not know that Keiva was banned as, I explain again, I have been away from the board. However, I now jump for joy and I'll drink a celebratory pint knowing that someone as hurtful, spiteful, low-down and conniving as him can hurt no-one on this board anymore. The pain, discord, suffering and acrimony he has caused is finally a thing of the past and we can go back to discussing words in harmony. Keiva has had his say and there is no need for him to reply to my post with his smarmy double-talk. My feelings for him are well expressed and any more words from him will just concrete these feelings further. You may be a friend of his but the feeling is not mutual. Stand up for him all you want but you will not change my opinion so why waste your energy? I do not speak for anyone on this board but myself but I feel that there is almost mutual consent amongst us about that person. Good riddance to him.

That's all I have to say. Don't bother replying to me or PM'ing as I really couldn't be bothered replying, let alone reading, anymore on the subject.

HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE! HE'S GONE!


#64406 04/29/02 06:46 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 200
A
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
A
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 200

#64407 04/29/02 07:21 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661

#64408 04/29/02 07:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
W
wwh Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
May I humbly suggest that prolonging this post is not in the best interests of the Board.


Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,367
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 581 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,561
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,919
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5