|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 163
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 163 |
Yes ... but in certain marital situations no comment made can be an explanation, only an excuse.
The easiest thing is to just apologise. It doesn't matter if you know what you are apologising for or why, just apologise.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,773
Pooh-Bah
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,773 |
The easiest thing is to just apologise. It doesn't matter if you know what you are apologising for or why, just apologise.
You see? There really are some universal standards.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803 |
just apologise
some universal standards
Yeah, ya gotta humor them.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,661 |
Yeah, ya gotta humor them.
Isn't that part of the standard marriage vows?
"To have and to hold, to love, humor, cherish..."
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,636
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,636 |
Well, if ya know which side your toast is honey-buttered on.....[flipping hair back with both hands-e]  'cause if ya can't be arsed with bowing to the goddess.......
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 163
member
|
|
OP
member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 163 |
My father taught me the most important words any husband needs to know. For him they have worked for just over 50 years: "Yes Dear"
(A close second is pretending to read the newspaper.)
The nice thing about "Yes Dear" is that it can be said with almost as many different tones of voice as "Nothing" which most husband's I'm sure have heard at least once in response to the question, "What's wrong?"
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,605 |
If you want your marriage to flourish,
Like love in a loving cup,
When you know that you're wrong, admit it;
When you know that you're right, shut up.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 144
member
|
|
member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 144 |
Sorry for the delay chaps - been rather busy - from what I remember of (hazily) learning law, the arguments were about excuse vs justification.
An excuse did just that - excused the action. It offered a valid (in the mind of the defendant) reason for why the action had occurred and why the defendant should not be held responsible for it.
A justification justified why the action had occurred but made no attempt to excuse it. As in 'pleading guilty with justification"
Perhaps in transport to Ontario that justification has got translated into explanation?
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,334
Members9,182
| |
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
|
|
|
0 members (),
752
guests, and
1
robot. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
