|About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us|
You are not logged in. [Log In] Wordsmith.org » Forums » (Old) Weekly themes. (have been consolidated into a single forum above) » Beheading words » The be- prefix: adding or subtracting? Register User Forum List Calendar Active Topics Search FAQ
#53434 - 01/31/02 04:46 PM Re: The be- prefix: adding or subtracting?
It seems, however, that in all the offered specimens, that there, at least, is an inherent ambiguity in the
As usual, Shakespeare best expressed that ambiguity: "To be- or not to be-; that is the question".
#53435 - 02/02/02 12:27 PM Re: The be- prefix: adding or subtracting?
I've been meaning to get around to this for sime time and finally got off my duff.
The be- prefix in Old English had three possible meanings.
Quoted from A Guide to Old English by Bruce Mitchell and Fred C. Robinson:
be- 1 In some words be- is the same as the prep. 'about', e.g. be-gan'surround' and be-ridan 'ride
2 Sometimes it is a deprivative, e.g. be-dælan 'deprive' and be-heafdian 'behead'.
3 It can make an intransitive verb transitive, e.g. be-<THORN>encan 'think about' and be-wepan 'bewail'.
#53436 - 02/02/02 02:42 PM Re: The be- prefix: adding or subtracting?
Loc: Rio Grande, Cape May County, N...
Thanks for that, Faldage! To be- or not to be- is no longer the be- question! (or be- quest!)
So I guess the only item left here to bequestion the Board with is "do you consider betrothed to be a gaining or losing, or both?
#53437 - 02/02/02 05:18 PM Re: The be- prefix: adding or subtracting?
Sometimes it is a deprivative, e.g. 'behead'.
Faldage is of course cross-threading to "bobbit".
We are much beholden to you, sir.
#53438 - 02/02/02 09:50 PM Re: Speaking for Keiva
I would say that he apologizes to me for suggesting that I intended something that I neither intended nor, in retrospect, recognized that I intended.
The thread started with: why does behead imply taking something away?
[cross thread]Please do not ever presume to put words in my mouth[/cross thread]
#53439 - 02/03/02 12:23 AM Re: speaking facetiously
My dear faldage, and not to pick nits, but there's such a thing as speaking facetiously, and I'd think there's a great difference between
"faldage says _______ [ wink ]" and
"keiva says ________ [no wink]"
I agree with you that a winkless misquote might well call for an apology.
#53440 - 02/03/02 07:52 AM Re: speaking facetiously
I would like to apologize publicly to Keiva for not using smileys (except facetiously)
#53441 - 02/03/02 09:54 AM Re: speaking facetiously
Huh? No apology needed here, buddy. LMBYAB. [beer -e]
Forum Stats 8941 Members
Max Online: 3341 @ 12/09/11 02:15 PM
Newest Members SSD, poeticalPolitics, SAISPURTHY19, poster, hunsister
8941 Registered Users
Who's Online 0 registered (), 14 Guests and 3 Spiders online. Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters (30 Days)
endymion6 97 LukeJavan8 79 wofahulicodoc 64 May 54 poster 1
wwh 13858 Faldage 13803 Jackie 11613 tsuwm 10538 LukeJavan8 8378 Buffalo Shrdlu 7210 wofahulicodoc 6724 AnnaStrophic 6511 Wordwind 6296 of troy 5400
Board Rules · Mark all read Contact Us · Wordsmith.org · Top
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.
Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat
© 1994-2016 Wordsmith