Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
#38735 - 08/18/01 07:10 AM In defense of the President  
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 273
Vernon Compton Offline
enthusiast
Vernon Compton  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 273
NZ
Those who mock Mr Bush's intellect might be surprised by the following:


The Onion 1 August 2001

[Bush Finds Error In Fermilab Calculations]

BATAVIA, IL--President Bush met with members of the Fermi National
Accelerator Laboratory research team Monday to discuss a mathematical
error he recently discovered in the famed laboratory's "Improved
Determination Of Tau Lepton Paths From Inclusive Semileptonic B-Meson
Decays" report.

"I'm somewhat out of my depth here," said Bush, a longtime Fermilab
follower who describes himself as "something of an armchair
physicist." "But it seems to me that, when reducing the perturbative
uncertainty in the determination of Vub from semileptonic Beta
decays, one must calculate the rate of Beta events with a standard
dilepton invariant mass at a subleading order in the hybrid
expansion. The Fermilab folks' error, as I see it, was omitting that
easily overlooked mathematical transformation and, therefore,
acquiring incorrectly re-summed logarithmic corrections for the
b-quark mass. Obviously, such a miscalculation will result in a
precision of less than 25 percent in predicting the resulting path of
the tau lepton once the value for any given decaying tau neutrino is
determined."

The Bush correction makes it possible for scientists to further study
the tau lepton, a subatomic particle formed by the collision of a tau
neutrino and an atomic nucleus.

Bush resisted criticizing the Fermilab scientists responsible for the
error, saying it was "actually quite small" and that "anyone could
have made the mistake."

"High-energy physics is a complex and demanding field, and even top
scientists drop a decimal point or two every now and then," Bush
said. "Also, I might hasten to add that what I pointed out was more a
correction of method than of mathematics. Experimental results on the
Tevatron accelerator would have exposed the error in time, anyway."

Fermilab director Michael Witherell said the president was being too
modest "by an order of magnitude."

"In addition to gently reminding us that even the best minds in the
country are occasionally fallible, President Bush has saved his
nation a few million dollars," Witherell said. "We would have made
four or five runs on the particle accelerator with faulty data before
figuring out what was wrong. But, thanks to Mr. Bush, we're back on
track."

"It's true, I dabbled in the higher maths during my Yale days," said
Bush, who spent three semesters as an assistant to Drs. Kahsa and
Slaughter at Yale's renowned Sloane High-Energy Physics Lab. "But I
didn't have the true gift for what Gauss called 'the musical language
in which is spoken the very universe.' If I have any gift at all,
it's my instinct for process and order."

Continued Bush: "As much as I enjoyed studying physics at Yale, by my
junior year it became apparent that I could far better serve humanity
through a career in statecraft."

While he says he is "flattered and honored" by the tau-neutrino
research team's request that he review all subsequent Fermilab
publications on lepton-path determination, Bush graciously declined
the "signal honor."

"This sort of thing is best left to the likes of [Thomas] Becher and
[Matthias] Neubert, not a dilettante such as myself," Bush said. "I
just happened to have some time on the plane coming back from the
European G8 summit, decided to catch up on some reading, and spotted
one rather small logarithmic branching-ratio misstep in an otherwise
flawless piece of scientific scholarship. Anyone could have done the
same."

Copyright 2001 Onion, Inc., All rights reserved.
http://www.theonion.com/






#38736 - 08/18/01 07:43 AM  
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,409
Max Quordlepleen Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Max Quordlepleen  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,409

#38737 - 08/23/01 02:57 AM Re: In defense of the President  
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 157
francais31415 Offline
member
francais31415  Offline
member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 157
I'm a Bush supporter, but...isn't theonion.com a sattirical publication? (I remember reading something in Reader's Digest - an editor's response to a reader's letter about the Harry Potter author being a Satanist. The reader's source was theonion.com.)


#38738 - 08/23/01 01:03 PM Re: In defense of the President  
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,094
Jazzoctopus Offline
old hand
Jazzoctopus  Offline
old hand

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,094
Cincinnati & Loveland, Ohio, U...
I'm a Bush supporter, but...isn't theonion.com a sattirical publication?

Yes, this article is slander, rather humorous slander, I must admit, but slander nonetheless.


#38739 - 08/23/01 01:23 PM Re: In defense of the President  
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538
tsuwm Offline
Carpal Tunnel
tsuwm  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538
this too shall pass
>slander

and Vernon's subjectification is irony! let's sue him too.
-ron o.


#38740 - 08/23/01 01:24 PM Re: slander  
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Faldage Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Faldage  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
this article is slander

Aside from the fact that you mean libel, can attributing great mental acumen to someone be considered defamation?



#38741 - 08/23/01 02:05 PM Re: slander  
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,094
Jazzoctopus Offline
old hand
Jazzoctopus  Offline
old hand

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,094
Cincinnati & Loveland, Ohio, U...
can attributing great mental acumen to someone be considered defamation?

When it's obviously extreme sarcasm, yes.

Aside from the fact that you mean libel

Do I? slander - the utterance of false charges or misrepresentations which defame and damage another's reputation I suppose you mean he done did in his reputation himself

#38742 - 08/23/01 02:24 PM Re: slander v. libel  
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Faldage Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Faldage  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
obviously extreme sarcasm

Tone of voice? I didn't use any tone of voice!

the utterance of slander as opposed to a written statement as you will find in the definition of libel.


#38743 - 08/23/01 05:21 PM Re: slander v. libel  
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,094
Jazzoctopus Offline
old hand
Jazzoctopus  Offline
old hand

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,094
Cincinnati & Loveland, Ohio, U...
obviously extreme sarcasm

Tone of voice? I didn't use any tone of voice!


Not you, the Onion article!


#38744 - 08/23/01 05:27 PM Re: slander v. libel  
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Faldage Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Faldage  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
the Onion article

They didn't use any tone of voice, either.

Hence, libel v. slander.


Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Moderated by  Jackie 

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,877
Posts223,585
Members9,003
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
bpatterson0032, Aladitya_khan, JdawgGaming, Hiteshi, JaneJane
9003 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 43 guests, and 2 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters(All Time)
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,538
LukeJavan8 8,878
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2017 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.014s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 2.7328 MB (Peak: 2.8669 MB) Zlib disabled. Server Time: 2017-05-27 17:44:08 UTC