|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,055
old hand
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,055 |
It was just a jovial variation on casus belli, like calling you dictum fanaticus or something. You get my drift?
Is it a real phrase? - Is now, eh.
Is it at least grammatically correct? - I dunno.
You see Wordster, I was with 'casus dictum' trying to make the point, that often only when one becomes a tad hot under the collar about a certain topic, does it generally provoke people to speak plainly about it. A hostile start to a conversation often yields the most insightful discussions, in my eyes.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,773
Pooh-Bah
|
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,773 |
the most insightful discussions, in my eyes
And we all know how painful that can be
>rimshot<
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,055
old hand
|
|
OP
old hand
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,055 |
And we all know how painful that can be
The language of thought is not identical to any spoken language (lucky for you).
Therefore I'll happily strain the sense of your post.
*paradiddle* no, stuff that ....
!*double off-beat*!
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,331
Members9,182
| |
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
|
|
|
0 members (),
1,189
guests, and
1
robot. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
