|About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us|
You are not logged in. [Log In] Wordsmith.org » Forums » General Topics » Q&A about words » Register User Forum List Calendar Active Topics Search FAQ
#35127 - 07/09/01 11:42 PM
#35128 - 07/10/01 05:34 AM Re: Aye, Ae? Hai!
My ignorance of the speculations of the meta -language brigade is almost total, Max. But from a limited study of vocal tract mechanics and early language formation I would observe it starts as the simplest full-throat sound (similar to why a baby's early sounds will often include /a/ in such vowel&consonant clusters as dadadadad, mamamamama), modified by the natural diphthong effect of closing the lips and retracting the tongue at the end of the production.
#35129 - 07/10/01 06:50 PM Eh?
Loc: lower upstate New York
& [runnin'n'duckin' from the Canadians]
But seriously, folks: Good question, Max. I dunno....
I'll go with maverick's idea (the bit about mamama and dadada I first heard put forth by L. Bernstein on a TV program in the 60s about sounds and music).
#35130 - 07/11/01 06:03 AM Re: Aye, Ae? Hai!
There might be some universal tendencies, but I think you'd be hard pressed to distinguish them from chance. An open-mouthed vocable of surprise (of the ah/oh kind), a slack one of assent (ha/hm/mm), and a broken one of negation (uh-uh/mm-mm) perhaps occur more widely than can be explained as common culture. For example, glottalized m-m means 'no' in Hausa.
But really, you've got quite as many counterexamples: iie in Japanese for 'no', Greek ne 'yes'. These mama effects are pretty weak.
English aye 'yes' is of unknown origin, with no obvious counterpart even in German or Norse. Japanese hai points to Old Japanese pai or some such, but H < P anyway. For the Maaori, you'd want to get any other Austronesian cognates first to see what it came from.
There's no way any of those groups can be connected. It's been suggested that Japanese and Austronesian are related, but if so it's at such a great depth that no single word can be held up as cognate; and there hasn't been any opportunity of borrowing in millennia either.
So it's all just coincidence, I think.
#35131 - 07/11/01 06:59 AM Re: Aye, Ae? Hai!
Loc: lower upstate New York
I am happy to see the return of your good self and your well-thought-out philological posts. FoolsŪ rule! hi Faldage!
#35132 - 07/11/01 07:03 AM Re: Aye, Ae? Hai!
I'll second that, Nicholas - your contributions are always fascinating. [shakes head, muttering where does he get that breadth of experience from?!]
#35133 - 07/11/01 02:16 PM
Forum Stats 8910 Members
Max Online: 3341 @ 12/09/11 02:15 PM
Newest Members folatre, Rockyhud220, L82cannon, tien170164, ramulusri
8910 Registered Users
Who's Online 0 registered (), 121 Guests and 6 Spiders online. Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters (30 Days)
wofahulicodoc 79 endymion6 76 LukeJavan8 62 May 25 BranShea 3 Markubus5 2 Tromboniator 1 peter_in_boston 1 Hansje1980 1
wwh 13858 Faldage 13803 Jackie 11613 tsuwm 10537 LukeJavan8 8046 Buffalo Shrdlu 7210 AnnaStrophic 6511 wofahulicodoc 6418 Wordwind 6296 of troy 5400
Board Rules · Mark all read Contact Us · Wordsmith.org · Top
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.
Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat
© 1994-2016 Wordsmith