Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
#29300 - 05/17/01 08:19 AM Re: trompe  
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 609
rodward Offline
addict
rodward  Offline
addict

Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 609
Portsmouth, United Kingdom
Rod says: However I believe that only "trompe l'oeil" is correct.
Then how come you were using "trompe d'oeil" in your previous post?
asks confused of Atlanta.

AS. I was responding to CK's post in which he used "trompe d'oeil", but (mea culpa) didn't notice the mistake until you asked your question about "trompe l'oeil". I hide behind the fact that the frequent use of "trompe d'oeil" has inured me to its (probable) incorrectness. Any native/bi-lingual French speakers care to make a definitive statement?

Rod



#29301 - 05/17/01 08:58 AM Re: trompe  
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,146
Capital Kiwi Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Capital Kiwi  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,146
Northamptonshire, England
What a laugh - you've all been arguing over a bloody spelling mistake! I intended trompe l'oeil..

And I stand by my statement. Trompe l'oeil may not have been invented during the Rennaissance, but it came into its own then as part of art and architecture. The deception originally was the extension of an object by painting "more" of it - hence the architectural focus. The best translation of it that I've seen is "optical deception" or "trick of the eye". It was used to "visually extend" a room or a building, or even the view from a window. This was why it was photographically realistic in nature. The term has simply transmuted over time into anything which is an device for optical illusion, again either in art or in architecture.

(Damn, I KNEW those art history classes would come in handy one day!)



The idiot also known as Capfka ...
#29302 - 05/17/01 09:40 AM Re: trompe  
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 609
rodward Offline
addict
rodward  Offline
addict

Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 609
Portsmouth, United Kingdom
you've all been arguing over a bloody spelling mistake! I intended trompe l'oeil..
says CK.

CK, no matter it was a slip by your good self, a quick google will show thet the two terms are used interchangeably. It is perfectly valid to question which term is (or whether both are) correct.

And it's a shame that the Renaissance photographer's film got spoilt at the developers. I suppose that any "deceit of the eye" must be to a large degree "photographically realistic". I agree that the vast body of trompe l'oeil work is of the nature you describe, I just don't think that the term has ever been limited to it. But I wasn't around at the time, and it is a very small point to be arguing about. We could start the "War of Tromp's eye" if you like?

Rod


#29303 - 05/17/01 11:55 AM Re: trump Louie  
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Faldage Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Faldage  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
He din't do nothin to earn my ire. We wuz playin bridge an he led a heart. I wuz outta hearts but I had me a spade (the trey) an spades wuz trump. I took that trick an the nex five an beat his tiny clunem. But I don' hate him er nuthin.


#29304 - 05/17/01 12:17 PM Re: Name for a pictorial illusion  
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 393
NicholasW Offline
enthusiast
NicholasW  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 393
London
Wittgenstein made something of this in the Investigations--unfortunately, I don't remember what it was and my books are still packed--any takers?

Duck-wabbit.

I'm sorry, I'll read that again. Duck-rabbit.

He was making the point that we don't just see things (ducks, rabbits, drawings), we see things as things (the drawing as a duck or a wabbit).


#29305 - 05/17/01 12:30 PM Re: Name for a pictorial illusion  
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Jackie Offline
Jackie  Offline

Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Louisville, Kentucky
we don't just see things (ducks, rabbits, drawings), we see things as things (the drawing as a duck or a wabbit).

Yes! Minds are amazing, are they not? Like in some of those illusion pictures: for ex., inside a grid of dots there is a blank, three-sided space, and we "see" a triangle, even though there are no lines defining the boundaries. We're seeing what isn't there. Gee--is that
mental ullage?



#29306 - 05/17/01 12:41 PM Re: trompe  
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
AnnaStrophic Offline
Carpal Tunnel
AnnaStrophic  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
lower upstate New York
Cap'nK guffaws: What a laugh - you've all been arguing over a bloody spelling mistake!

Yeah, and here, of all places!


#29307 - 05/17/01 12:44 PM Re: trompe  
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
AnnaStrophic Offline
Carpal Tunnel
AnnaStrophic  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
lower upstate New York
Rod, thanks for your indulgence. I am always confused when it comes to French.hi, F!


#29308 - 05/17/01 12:50 PM Re: trompe  
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Faldage Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Faldage  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
CapK states: ]I KNEW those art history classes would come in handy one day!

So does this date back to Rome? We see all those fancy painted walls in Pompeii.


#29309 - 05/17/01 10:17 PM Re: trompel'oeil  
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 28
Lucy Offline
newbie
Lucy  Offline
newbie

Joined: May 2000
Posts: 28
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Thank you all for your contributions - this really is an excellent forum for this sort of query.

We'd thought of 'trompe l'oeil' but in our experience the term seems to be restricted to architectural type uses (ceilings, wall paintings etc) not small book illustrations. If we're wrong, (distinctly possible!) then perhaps that's the problem solved. An example of it being used in this way would be manna.

Emanuela, I knew the Holbein (etc) trick of distortion but didn't know the word 'anamorfosi' - thank you. I'll chase that up, but it still may not be the correct word for our purpose, as in 'The Ambassadors' (for example) the skull is merely distorted - it doesn't really have two meaningful views.

We wondered about 'pictogram' - but don't seem to be getting very far with this line of thought. Oh the delights of one small gloss.


Page 3 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Moderated by  Jackie 

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,877
Posts223,565
Members9,002
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Aladitya_khan, JdawgGaming, Hiteshi, JaneJane, Baldilocks
9002 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 39 guests, and 3 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters(All Time)
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,538
LukeJavan8 8,871
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2017 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.013s Queries: 13 (0.003s) Memory: 2.7350 MB (Peak: 2.8679 MB) Zlib disabled. Server Time: 2017-05-22 19:32:19 UTC