Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
You are not logged in. [Log In] Wordsmith.org Forums Q&A about words Which sentence is the correctly joined? Register Forums Calendar Active Threads Search Forum Help
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#213195 - 11/13/13 08:12 AM Which sentence is the correctly joined?
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 41 Lionel Koh![]()
newbie![]()
newbie
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 41 The police had been looking for the snatch thief for the past two weeks. Rupert was the snatch thief. (This is a question which tests students on synthesis of sentences.)
Where I live, the second sentence refers to the fact that Rupert was the snatch thief. I wonder whether native speakers interpret it that way.
I have joined above underlined sentences as follows and wonder which sentence is correctly joined? If neither, how should the sentences be joined? Thanks.
Rupert was the snatch thief, whom the police had been looking for the past two weeks.
Rupert, whom the police had been looking for for the past two weeks, was the snatch thief.
Last edited by Lionel Koh; 11/13/13 08:15 AM.
#213199 - 11/13/13 04:12 PM Re: Which sentence is the correctly joined? [Re: Lionel Koh]
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 41 Lionel Koh![]()
newbie![]()
newbie
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 41 Could somebody please help?
#213213 - 11/14/13 07:01 AM Re: Which sentence is the correctly joined? [Re: Lionel Koh]
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,554 jenny jenny![]()
veteran![]()
veteran
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,554
Lower Aberdeen, Mississippi The police had been looking for the snatch thief for the past two weeks. Then Rupert was found to be the snatch thief.
But remember, Lionel.
Rupert is innocent until proven guilty by a jury of his peers.
Is not your world the same?
#213216 - 11/14/13 01:12 PM Re: Which sentence is the correctly joined? [Re: Lionel Koh]
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803 Faldage![]()
Carpal Tunnel![]()
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803 Rupert is PRESUMED innocent till found guilty.
I'd go with:
Rupert was the snatch thief that the police had been looking for the past two weeks.
No comma and that instead of whom. This is a good old fashioned restrictive clause. Presumably there are other snatch thieves out there that the police were either not looking for or who they had not been looking for for the past two weeks.
The other version assumes the police already knew Rupert was the snatch thief or that he was being sought by the police for some other matter. I'm assuming that the police were looking for the snatch thief and that all you are saying is that that snatch thief was, in fact, Rupert. And if you want to go all high-register I would pied-pipe that whom up front and say:
Rupert, for whom the police had been looking for the past two weeks, was the snatch thief.
If you want good old colloquial English, who is just fine in this context:
Rupert, who the police had been looking for for the past two weeks, was the snatch thief.
#213217 - 11/14/13 02:35 PM Re: Which sentence is the correctly joined? [Re: Faldage]
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538 tsuwm![]()
Carpal Tunnel![]()
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538
this too shall pass while we're about this, what's the origin of "snatch thief"? it certainly isn't an idiom you hear in American English.
#213227 - 11/15/13 12:45 AM Re: Which sentence is the correctly joined? [Re: Lionel Koh]
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803 Faldage![]()
Carpal Tunnel![]()
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803 Google ngrams doesn't find it in British English, either.
#213259 - 11/17/13 06:48 PM Re: Which sentence is the correctly joined? [Re: tsuwm]
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 41 Lionel Koh![]()
newbie![]()
newbie
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 41 [quote=tsuwm]while we're about this, what's the origin of "snatch thief"? it certainly isn't an idiom you hear in American English. (This link (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snatch_theft)defines "snatch thief".)
Last edited by Lionel Koh; 11/17/13 06:59 PM.
#213260 - 11/17/13 09:27 PM Re: Which sentence is the correctly joined? [Re: Lionel Koh]
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538 tsuwm![]()
Carpal Tunnel![]()
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538
this too shall pass >a criminal act, common in Southeast Asia and South America
yes, I gathered this much, but those are rather geographically separate areas, and this doesn't really address my question as to the origin of the term.
#213263 - 11/18/13 01:26 AM Re: Which sentence is the correctly joined? [Re: Lionel Koh]
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803 Faldage![]()
Carpal Tunnel![]()
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803 I, for one, don't see a problem with the phrase snatch thief. It's not used in American, or apparently British, English but it is immediately obvious what it means.
#213265 - 11/18/13 03:41 AM Re: Which sentence is the correctly joined? [Re: Faldage]
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538 tsuwm![]()
Carpal Tunnel![]()
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538
this too shall pass I don't have a problem with it either, I was just wondering about the origin (he said for the third time).
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Moderated by Jackie
Forum Statistics Forums16Topics13,880Posts224,657Members9,048 Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members Sammy87, Bentron2000, Santanu, DavidOrigami, RichEngle
9048 Registered Users
Who's Online Now 1 registered members (SantaFeR), 88 guests, and 3 spiders. Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days) A C Bowden 28LukeJavan8 10
Top Posters(All Time) wwh 13,858Faldage 13,803Jackie 11,613tsuwm 10,538LukeJavan8 9,120wofahulicodoc 7,880Buffalo Shrdlu 7,210AnnaStrophic 6,511Wordwind 6,296of troy 5,400
Forum Rules · Mark All Read Contact Us · Wordsmith.org · Top