|
#208736 - 01/05/13 05:07 PM
Re: Cultural values
[Re: BranShea]
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,554
jenny jenny
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,554
Lower Aberdeen, Mississippi
|
Branshe, I agree. Rather than just a vehicle, the culture is the language. Desparate cultures will almost invariably evolve a language that identifies the in-group and best serves their particular needs. Hey, maybe Maverick wasn't asking "What is Culture?" but just wanted a sampling of our mores and regionalisms. 
|
|
|
|
#208752 - 01/06/13 01:17 PM
Re: Cultural values
[Re: jenny jenny]
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
BranShea
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Netherlands, the Hague
|
Topic is 'Cultural values'. Question was: 'What does the word culture mean to you?.' Cultural values are what a group or/and an individual values in social moral behaviour and in all cultural heritage and actual forms in kind. The word culture just contains too much for a personal answer (imo. Maverick is silent; dear Maverick, I hereby would like to hear yóur answer to your question. ( if can be  )
|
|
|
|
#208753 - 01/06/13 01:24 PM
Re: Cultural values
[Re: jenny jenny]
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757
maverick
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757
|
heh, no moderator me - nor power nor will to curtail any discussion. I'm just a monkey clever enough to find that lobbing a stone in the waterhole creates some pretty patterns and sometimes gets the other monkeys' interest...  Thanks for some thoughtful responses. I particularly found useful the associations you drew through analogous terns, nuncle. But all have been interesting. My thoughts were stirred in this direction by a talking-heads radio show on the BBC recently. Melvyn Bragg has assembled some leading brains around a table and discusses the sequential evolution of this term including its sociological connotations, initially in a British cultural context but swiftly branching into less insular waters. I think the programmes may be available as a download - I shall go look in case anyone wants to sample their thoughtful expositions. Yes, I think you can download each programme as an mp3 hereor are we supposed to say "you can gif it here"?!
Last edited by maverick; 01/06/13 01:28 PM.
|
|
|
|
#208761 - 01/06/13 10:05 PM
Re: Cultural values
[Re: tsuwm]
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757
maverick
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757
|
and yet, you dasn't answer your own question?!  heh, for you magister, ok.... I think there seemed a fair consensus of responses around the basic idea that culture is an expression of group thought and endeavour – all the actions of the tribe that are learned, assimilated, handed down (whatever the demographic boundary of the group we happen to be thinking about, as Jackie implies). I’m not totally convinced by the clade concept, not so much because it doesn’t give a good description of the outcomes in many cases but more because it seems to look through the wrong end of the lens: it implies a coherent reaching for some ulterior objective, yet clade membership could know nothing of such boundaries. If I am not clear there, what I mean is it is like the misinterpretation of Darwinian logic that suggests creatures somehow evolve towards some higher state, whereas what actually happens is variation, culled by exposure. I note that Fong’s apparently facetious remark typically wears his learning lightly: yes, the way the bugs in the milk affect their environment and create certain visible outputs does tell us quite a bit about cultural normative influences, I think. I like nuncle’s suggested nuance that it’s implicitly bound up with “caring for” something – this points me to the key point for my interest in culture, that it cannot be value neutral. Whilst we might tend to broad agreement that culture is a bit like the observable output of other life forms, it seems important to me that we are a reflective animal; that we don’t merely leave a blind cultural path like some sort of snail trail, but also have an important capacity to consider, choose, rationalise, communicate, and behave in socially co-operative ways that are vital components of the culture we create around us and leave to the generations that come after us. To give another analogy, when a woman creates a piece of pottery for certain practical purposes we can see the product as a cultural artefact; but with how much richer meaning does that piece of pottery become endowed when it has accumulated several generations of iteration and elaboration, subjected each time to comparison, praise, study, copy, and so on? It seems to me that these processes over time lead to a higher form of cultural production, a more deeply meaningful reflection of what it is to be human – and thus (whether it’s a pot, a fabric, a picture, a piece of wrought metal, a song or a fragment of poetry) we come to produce aspects of culture that we recognise as ‘art’ rather than merely value-neutral articles of craft. Sure, all are aspects of culture: but not all, I think, are equal. Who imparts or arbitrates the value scale is a whole nother thang… That’s my not formally reasoned nor highly polished take on it so far anyway, and I will be interested to hear anything else all-y’all come up with, including if you like the broadcasts.
|
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics13,878
Posts223,862
Members9,013
| |
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
|
|
|
0 registered members (),
43
guests, and
3
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
