Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
relevance or relevancy? #1975
05/08/00 11:41 AM
05/08/00 11:41 AM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1
Singapore
U
unicorn Offline OP
stranger
unicorn  Offline OP
stranger
U
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1
Singapore
Can anyone tell me if "relevancy" is an acceptable alternative to "relevance"? I've seen it "relevancy" in official legal publications but it just strikes me as wrong and awkward...


Re: relevance or relevancy? #1976
05/09/00 01:06 PM
05/09/00 01:06 PM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 19
Washington, DC, USA
G
GZini Offline
stranger
GZini  Offline
stranger
G
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 19
Washington, DC, USA
I actually had a little debate about this in law school. "Relevancy," in Black's Law Dictionary (4th edition --old!), is the term under which concepts of evidentiary relevance are discussed. My layman's dictionary, some sort of Webster's, lists "relevancy" and cross-references to "relevance."

In the legal profession, at least, it may be a question of personal preference. My personal preference is to speak like the rest of the public does and use "relevance."


Re: relevance or relevancy? #1977
05/09/00 08:26 PM
05/09/00 08:26 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,981
J
jmh Offline
Pooh-Bah
jmh  Offline
Pooh-Bah
J
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,981
Its the same with competence and competency

Competency, as I understand it, is a legal term meaning capacity to testify in a court of law; eligibility to be sworn, a witness would be legally competent) but it can also mean the same as competence (capable, able; sufficient income to live on).

Recently (in the UK and perhaps elsewhere) it has used in the sense of "the job requires certain competencies". It always irritates me as it seems a rather clumsy word when the term "level or levels of competence" works perfectly well.

That's my gripe of the week over with!


Re: relevance or relevancy? #1978
05/10/00 11:58 AM
05/10/00 11:58 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Louisville, Kentucky
Jackie Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Jackie  Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Louisville, Kentucky
Jo--
>That's my gripe of the week over with!<
Have you a new one each week, then?? What a good idea!
Perhaps we should ask Anu to make this a nu (could NOT
resist! sorry, Anu!) category for the bulletin board?
Better allow a lot of space!




Re: relevance or relevancy? #1979
05/11/00 04:04 PM
05/11/00 04:04 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,004
London, UK
shanks Offline
old hand
shanks  Offline
old hand
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,004
London, UK
Dear Jo

As one with some contact with the Human Resources team in my firm, I believe the word 'competency', whilst perhaps ill-derived, now has a technical meaning that cannot be directly equated with level of competence. As used now, it refers to a basic skill level that is necessary in a particular field or area (verbal ability, commercial ability etc) for a person to be able to perform the job competently.

For instance, our ideal Branch Managers 'competency' profile might set minimum levels of competence within the verbal, numerical, leadership, initiative, selling, procedural and one or two other competencies that would be different from the levels required of, say, a Sales Manager. Put all the competencies together and you get a 'Job Profile Analysis'.

I know, I know - we all deplore the spread of jargon, but sometimes it starts with a relatively reasonable at defining the technical terms of a specialist field. Unfortunately, it then proliferates into a virus of the language... you know the result.

cheer

the sunshine warrior


Re: relevance or relevancy? #1980
05/11/00 06:37 PM
05/11/00 06:37 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,981
J
jmh Offline
Pooh-Bah
jmh  Offline
Pooh-Bah
J
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,981
Shanks

Thank you for your much better definition. I'm involved in training and spent hours setting the wretched things for NVQs (non-vocational qualifications in England&Wales). I think it was chosen, over say "level of competence" because the key idea in NVQs is that there are no levels (say A+, B-) if you are looking at say, the task of typing a letter to an acceptable level, you either are competent or you are not, like an on-off switch not a scale.

As they say in Human Resources Mangement - I hear what you say .... but .... the word still sounds clumsy, especially, as you say, technical terms tend to filter into everyday language.

I think I'll utter one of Jackie's favourite words (was it demisemihemiquaver) to myself whenever I hear it!


Re: relevance or relevancy? #1981
05/11/00 07:21 PM
05/11/00 07:21 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538
this too shall pass
tsuwm Offline
Carpal Tunnel
tsuwm  Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538
this too shall pass
>was it demisemihemiquaver
it's hemidemisemiquaver - a 1/64 note in music - there's no way to remember this, it's just the way it evolved from quaver to semiquaver to...

http://members.aol.com/tsuwm/

Re: relevance or relevancy? #1982
05/12/00 07:46 AM
05/12/00 07:46 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,004
London, UK
shanks Offline
old hand
shanks  Offline
old hand
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,004
London, UK
Jo

I hope it was a deliberate (bitter? twisted?) joke on your part to describe NVQs (National Vocational Qualifications) as non-vocational qualifications.

In any case I need to thank you for your earlier post, because it allowed me the opportunity to become a newbie. I have been translated to a higher realm. Some day I may even aspire to becoming a member. Huzzah!

cheer

the sunshine warrior

ps. I hope to start another thread, in Miscellanea, regarding a question of accents. Probably most appropriate for those who watch the BBC!


Re: oops #1983
05/12/00 09:18 AM
05/12/00 09:18 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,981
J
jmh Offline
Pooh-Bah
jmh  Offline
Pooh-Bah
J
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,981
> I hope it was a deliberate (bitter? twisted?) joke on your part to describe NVQs (National Vocational Qualifications) as non-vocational qualifications

You are correct - a Freudian slip, I believe itís called. I really don't have a problem with NVQ's as a concept - just the four-hour meetings I had to go to, arguing about minutiae, rather like this newsgroup but much, much more dull!



Re: relevance or relevancy? #1984
05/12/00 11:34 AM
05/12/00 11:34 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Louisville, Kentucky
Jackie Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Jackie  Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Louisville, Kentucky
Sunshine warrior--

"translated" to a higher realm! How appropriate! Cheer!



Moderated by  Jackie 

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,883
Posts224,828
Members9,056
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Nikki1221, Veezkneez, LOC, Luna, wordie
9056 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 145 guests, and 5 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
LOC 1
Top Posters(All Time)
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,538
LukeJavan8 9,157
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2018 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1.1
(Release build 20180111)
Page Time: 0.018s Queries: 13 (0.005s) Memory: 3.1405 MB (Peak: 3.3206 MB) Zlib disabled. Server Time: 2018-06-19 07:03:47 UTC