Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
BranShea #197258 02/10/11 10:36 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
I wouldn't presume to speak for jheem; but, having preposed that, maybe it's the difference between sheep and bison?! a herd of buffalo (hi eta!) is a lot more prepossessing than a flock of sheep, after all.

or maybe he's pulling our collective leg.. naah.

Last edited by tsuwm; 02/10/11 10:39 PM.
BranShea #197259 02/10/11 11:24 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
What ís the difference between a flock and a herd?

A flock takes a plural verb, but a herd does not. They're the same thing as far as the referents go.


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
zmjezhd #197260 02/10/11 11:25 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 9,916
Likes: 2
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 9,916
Likes: 2
I've forgotten most of my algebra/geometry, Zm....
But I do get some of it.


----please, draw me a sheep----
zmjezhd #197261 02/11/11 12:46 AM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 724
Avy Offline OP
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 724
Originally Posted By: zmjezhd
. Syntactically, the noun phrase, the trail of ants, is the subject of the sentence. Subject verb concord would be based on the head noun phrase the trail. How you handle the verb, singular versus plural, does have something to do with how you interpret the whole NP, the trail of ants. I would treat a flock of sheep as plural, but a herd of bison as singular: e.g., "A flock of sheep were cropping my lawn", but "a herd of bison was blocking the road".

Thanks. That is useful to know. How would you treat "a trail of ants" - with the verb concord based on the noun or NP?

zmjezhd #197262 02/11/11 12:55 AM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 724
Avy Offline OP
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 724
Originally Posted By: zmjezhd


I was thinking more along the lines of variable substitution. You can have the following (simple) grammatical rule:

S -> NP VP
NP -> det N (PP)
PP -> prep NP
VP -> V (NP) (PP)
det -> a | an | the
N -> dog | cat | book | bird | pond
prep -> on | at | by
V reads | loves | eats

So, the follow are valid or (*) invalid sentences licensed by this grammar:

The dog ate the book.
A cat reads a book by the pond.
*A car ran over my dog.
etc.

It's way more complicated than that with nodes being headed by certain words or subnodes, etc.


Way Interesting! Does that mean we can get a computer to form sentences through programming grammar?

zmjezhd #197263 02/11/11 12:57 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Originally Posted By: zmjezhd
I would treat a flock of sheep as plural, but a herd of bison as singular: e.g., "A flock of sheep were cropping my lawn", but "a herd of bison was blocking the road".


In this case it's the individual sheep that were cropping your lawn, not the flock. On the other hand, it's really the herd that's blocking the road, not any of the individual bisons.

I would say that the flock of sheep was blocking the road and the herd of bison were cropping my lawn.

zmjezhd #197266 02/11/11 02:04 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Ooh, I loved diagramming sentences...and geometry too! Thanks for the links, zmjezhd. One of external links at the bottom of the first one lets you type in any sentence, and it will diagram it for you--what fun!

Jackie #197268 02/11/11 02:38 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 9,916
Likes: 2
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 9,916
Likes: 2
That I really like too.


----please, draw me a sheep----
Avy #197276 02/11/11 03:40 AM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Does that mean we can get a computer to form sentences through programming grammar?

Yes, you can use these kinds of grammars to parse sentences and generate them. The actual grammars are way more complicated than my little toy snippet was. There's a whole field of study called computational linguistics that works on this very thing. There are also statistical grammars and n-grams and all kinds of cool stuff. A decent university library should have some books on it. Or I can give you some pointers if you wish.


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
zmjezhd #197279 02/11/11 01:36 PM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 724
Avy Offline OP
old hand
OP Offline
old hand
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 724
Yes thanks. I would be interested to know more, but do dumb it down a bit. I am not as well informed as you in grammar or computers, and some times your posts I find hard to understand. The grammar as variable substitution post I understood ferpectly though.

Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,334
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 729 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,543
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,916
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5