|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542 |
it's just the number of online dictionary hits you get when you plug a word into the OneLook.com search tool. for an instance, searching for 'set', one of the more common English words, "We found 106 dictionaries with English definitions that include the word set". some folks here also referred to the more restrictive general dictionary score, "General (35 matching dictionaries)"
re: philiater - YCLIU at onelook.com
Last edited by tsuwm; 11/30/10 10:07 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 677
addict
|
OP
addict
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 677 |
It's 3 so that's all right then... ps is YCLIU an acronym for you can look it up? not so good with acronyms longer than three letters
----The next sentence is true. The previous sentence is false----
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542 |
YCLIU - I prefer the snootier "You Could Look It Up".
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 677
addict
|
OP
addict
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 677 |
True, and it sounds better, I prefer EHOAD myself
ps on further inspection philiater has a score of 2 - it's not on dictionary.com
----The next sentence is true. The previous sentence is false----
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542 |
just a note I'd add for anyone who might be unfortunate enough to get hooked by an interest in obscure words. the usefulness of onelook as a tool for analyzing the obscurity of words has been somewhat degraded by the rank amateurs now to be found online; see wiktionary, Wordnik, UD, etc. edit: and the tactics of Dictionary.com and others.
Last edited by tsuwm; 11/30/10 10:42 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 677
addict
|
OP
addict
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 677 |
In which case, if you are ignoring wordnik, then it is 1. Plus I'm not hooked to obscure words, I just read a bit of my (rather large and unwieldy) dictionary every day :p Also they must have found the entries somewhere and spent a lot of time typing up all of their entries no? The open dictionary allows one to add words (as does wiktionary I believe) but that is still a fairly reputable source...
the tactics of Dictionary.com and others what are these tactics of which you speak?
Last edited by bexter; 11/30/10 11:08 PM. Reason: reply to edit
----The next sentence is true. The previous sentence is false----
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542 |
Wordnik has some very good people behind it; their problem is that their wordlist is way ahead of the content; i.e., definitions and examples.
wiktionary is limited by the wiki construct.
Urban Dictionary is bleah and ecch.
>the tactics of Dictionary.com and others what are these tactics of which you speak?
your example is not atypical; they have many words listed which refer elsewhere or have no content at all; in other words, it seems as though having a word listed is more important than defining it! perhaps they're all just placeholders, but.
Last edited by tsuwm; 11/30/10 11:20 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803 |
YCLIU - I prefer the snootier "You Could Look It Up". "You Could Look It Up" is a quote from Casey Stengel, IIRC.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613 |
He was a baseball player, right?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542 |
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,372
Members9,182
|
Most Online3,341 Dec 9th, 2011
|
|
1 members (A C Bowden),
729
guests, and
1
robot. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|