|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 4
stranger
|
OP
stranger
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 4 |
I enjoy this is site. I see it uses "no-name-spell" for phonetics. (I call it this because it has no name as far as I can find out). That notation is useful because it's English friendly with no special symbols. Truespel is as well. It's indicated by a tilde(~). See below
peripatetic
PRONUNCIATION:(per-uh-puh-TET-ik)
As I hear it spoken in truespel notation it's ~pairuputtetik ~pair as in "pair" ~up as in "up" ~ut as in "ut" etc. Note thet stress is first syllable or after a double consonant.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542 |
>Note thet stress is first syllable or after a double consonant.
so you pronounce your name zur-ins-KAS?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 618
addict
|
addict
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 618 |
I enjoy this is site. I see it uses "no-name-spell" for phonetics. (I call it this because it has no name as far as I can find out). That notation is useful because it's English friendly with no special symbols. Truespel is as well. It's indicated by a tilde(~). See below
peripatetic
PRONUNCIATION:(per-uh-puh-TET-ik)
As I hear it spoken in truespel notation it's ~pairuputtetik ~pair as in "pair" ~up as in "up" ~ut as in "ut" etc. Note thet stress is first syllable or after a double consonant.
Am I the only one who wants to pronounce it... per-ee-puh-tet-ik (or maybe pe-ree...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 956
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 956 |
Am I the only one who wants to pronounce it...per-ee-puh-tet-ik (or maybe pe-ree...
Not quite alone, I'd say perry-puh-tet-ik
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542 |
peripatetic
PRONUNCIATION:(per-uh-puh-TET-ik)
maybe it would help to specify that the 'uh's are meant to be schwas: \'per-ə-pə-'te-tik\ [I can't get a schwa to come out]
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 956
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 956 |
I can't get a schwa to come out
Neither can I, but that would make more sense.
Last edited by olly; 02/26/09 01:43 AM. Reason: made a mess
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 618
addict
|
addict
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 618 |
Nope, definitely ee for me. It's much more than a schwa.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 956
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 956 |
Welkum tue thu forim Taam. Ie hoep yer stae iz laung and fruetfool.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 4
stranger
|
OP
stranger
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 4 |
That's the problem with present phonetics (IPA SAMPA). Not computer friendly. Not English friendly as well. So folks use no-name-spell as a work around. Linguists are not enamored of no-name-spell so they haven't named it.
I wouldn't use "per" (which rhymes with purr) to represent the first syllable. As the speaker said it, it was "pair", which I think is the right pronunciation.
Actually schwa stands for many sounds so it's not accurate. With truespel I've spelled out all schwas. 63k words are respelled in the truespel.com converter.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 4
stranger
|
OP
stranger
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 4 |
My name, Tom Zurinskas, as foespeld (phonetically spelled) in truespel is ~Taam Zerrinskis~ as my folks would say it.
~aa as in "Saab" ~er as in "her" ~in as in "in" (stressed after double consonant) ~kis as in "kiss"
From my data in truespel book 3, the ~er sound (as in "her") is spelled "er" about 70% of the time.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,529
Members9,187
|
Most Online3,341 Dec 9th, 2011
|
|
0 members (),
184
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
|