Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#180048 11/03/08 01:33 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 293
ParkinT Offline OP
enthusiast
OP Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 293
In today's AWAD, Anu states; "Prepositions don't get much respect. Nouns, verbs, adjectives... those are the words we usually pay attention to."
Hasn't he just broken a 'golden rule' regarding prepositions?!

I was taught, "A preposition is something you NEVER end a sentence with".

And I gotten my face slapped because I keep forgetting that, "A proposition is something you never end a sentence with."


"I am certain there is too much certainty in the world" -Michael Crichton
ParkinT #180049 11/03/08 02:16 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Hasn't he just broken a 'golden rule' regarding prepositions?!

Not hardly. The not-ending-a-sentence-with-a-preposition "rule" was invented out of whole cloth by just one man, John Dryden, for just one reason, he didn't like ending sentences with prepositions. People have been placing prepositions where they fit best for many hundreds of years before or after Mr Dryden elevated his quirky style to a "grammatical rule".

[link and link]


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
zmjezhd #180071 11/04/08 11:06 AM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 23
A
stranger
Offline
stranger
A
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 23
Thanks for those links, zmjezhd! I do like a bit of grammar myself, and I must say that my strictest instruction in grammar, particularly punctuation, came during the time I wrote limericks for OEDILF (under the name of Recumbentman). Nobody is as particular about correct usage as a correct American, I found.

As an admirer of Wittgenstein I regard grammar as important, but I agree that many shibboleths grew from a misplaced wish to import Latin grammar into English. The English saw themselves in the 17th century as heirs of the classics, particularly Dryden, who wrote in praise of Milton: "Three poets in three different ages born, Greece, Italy, and England did adorn. . . "

Curiously, Dryden wouldn't have got away with that comma between subject (three poets) and verb (did adorn) in OEDILF; at the least he would have been requested to add another comma after 'poets', making 'in three different ages born' into a proper subsidiary clause.

I often put Anu's 'Thoughts for Today' into my collection of quotes; today I snipped his wisdom about prepositions:

Quote:
A note about ending a sentence with a preposition. Some believe there's something wrong with that. It's a myth. One can find sentences ending with preps in the lines of some of the finest writers in history: Chaucer, Swift, Kipling, Shakespeare and so on. "We are such stuff as dreams are made on" -- Try rephrasing that line from The Tempest. See what inelegant glob results. This canard about no-prepositions-at-the-end belongs in the same dustbin as "Thou shalt not split an infinitive."
So the next time people fault you for ending a sentence with a preposition, ask them: "What are you talking about?"

Andrew Robinson #180075 11/04/08 01:33 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
I must say that my strictest instruction in grammar, particularly punctuation, came during the time I wrote limericks for OEDILF.

Oh, spelling and punctuation have nothing to do with grammar. That's another nit I have with the so-callled experts. And before another flame war starts, let me explain. Saying that grammar, spelling, and punctuation are separate entities does not mean that the latter two or any less important than the former. When I speak about grammar, I use the definition that most linguists (professional academics who study language systematically rather than inventing or passing along silly rules). Spelling and punctuation are attempts, however flawed, to add a sort of sugar coating to language. Language existed before writing. English spelling is a joke. It is a non-system, compared to something like Spanish or Korean. I have seen the "rules" of punctuation change in my lifetime. Many of the punctuation rules I learned in grammar and high school have been modified and superseded.

Wittgenstein does have some keen insights into language, especially seeing it as a kind of game. (He was the first philosopher, one of whose works I read.) Heidegger also had some worthwhile ideas about language. My favorite Wittgensteinian aphorism is: "philosophische Probleme entstehen, wenn die Sprache feiert" (Philospophical problems occur when language goes on holiday).

(And don't get me started about Oedilf; that lot has sucked the joy out of language and poetry.)


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
zmjezhd #180087 11/05/08 10:42 AM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 23
A
stranger
Offline
stranger
A
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 23
About spelling: Wittgenstein disliked rationalised languages like Esperanto, largely because the curiosities of spelling were lost. Each word that has a strange spelling carries part of its history along with it. He likened languages to cities, with an idiomatic ancient centre full of seemingly inexplicable corners, and new suburbs (like scientific language) laid out in straight lines at right angles.

About punctuation: what you say is interesting, but I have always regarded punctuation as an essential element of grammar. Of course this is a recent development, tied to writing rather than speech, but very important, and now surely indispensable.

Old punctuation puzzle:

Caesar entered on his head
A helmet on each foot
A sandal in his hand he held
His trusty sword to boot

Andrew Robinson #180088 11/05/08 12:11 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Funny one.

Andrew Robinson #180090 11/05/08 02:41 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
About punctuation: what you say is interesting, but I have always regarded punctuation as an essential element of grammar. Of course this is a recent development, tied to writing rather than speech, but very important, and now surely indispensable.

I stand by what I wrote. Spelling and punctuation are important, but not a part of grammar.

The thing about the old puzzle you pose is that it can be understood without any punctuation at all.

"Caesar entered. On his head a helmet, on each foot a sandal, [and] in his hand, he held his trusty sword."

There is nothing ungrammatical about the unpunctuated version. If I reformatted it in a difficult to read font, it would still be grammatical. Also, the sentence "Caesar entered on his head, a helmet on each foot, a sandal in his hand he held. His trusty sword to boot." is also grammatical but improbable.


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
zmjezhd #180092 11/05/08 03:06 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Agree; reading text without punctuation is funny and understandable. But for convenience' sake punctuation in books and letters can prevent certain misunderstandings (it reads more fluent)and it adds rhytm, music to the text. Part of the game.
Language is a game and communication, but also cadence, music.
In spoken language you hear punctuation too, some languages sing, some shout, some stammer to our ears.

BranShea #180105 11/05/08 10:16 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
I saw on the travel channel the other day that there is a language of whistles. It's in some really mountainous area--possibly Romania but I really don't remember--and the people of different villages whistle back and forth to each other across the valleys. It was described as an actual language, not a code or anything.

Jackie #180107 11/05/08 10:21 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 390
L
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
L
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 390
Originally Posted By: Jackie
I saw on the travel channel the other day that there is a language of whistles. It's in some really mountainous area--possibly Romania but I really don't remember--and the people of different villages whistle back and forth to each other across the valleys. It was described as an actual language, not a code or anything.


Silbo Gomero?

latishya #180115 11/06/08 05:36 AM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Z
Zed Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Z
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
The human need to communicate, whether the information being sent is vital to survival or not, is strong enough to overcome almost any obstacle.
Very cool.

latishya #180128 11/06/08 09:32 PM
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,295
Saint Lawrence Island

Turkey

There are more claims to it.
My grandfather had a canary that was very communicative.

Andrew Robinson #180130 11/07/08 04:12 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,067
Originally Posted By: Andrew Robinson
...but I have always regarded punctuation as an essential element of grammar. Of course this is a recent development, tied to writing rather than speech, but very important, and now surely indispensable.

It is sometimes connected, as for example in the possessive apostrophe, especially in the neuter singular, it's v. its - that is a case of the two being intertwined. But I would tend to agree with zmjezhd, generally speaking they are distinct entities.

ParkinT #180151 11/08/08 07:04 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4
B
stranger
Offline
stranger
B
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4
The problem with ending a sentence with "at" is usually not because it's a preposition, but because it's already been either stated or implied. Example: "Where is he at?" The word "where" means "at what place".

bilkirk #180153 11/09/08 12:07 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
And we all know what an abomination redundancy is.

Faldage #180155 11/09/08 02:36 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Yeah, redundancy is terrible.

Jackie #180158 11/09/08 03:22 AM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Z
Zed Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Z
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
specially when people keep on repeating it over and over.

Zed #180161 11/09/08 04:10 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
And doesn't it bug you when they say it again and again, and then one more time, just for repetitive measure?

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Yeah! Take the noun phrase "three dogs". You don't need that s on the end of dog, the three already shows that it's plural! Nobody misunderstands the phrase "three dog night". Don' need no stinking s on the end of that dog.

Faldage #180167 11/09/08 02:36 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
The where ... at construction is discussed in the MWDEU (link and link).


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
Faldage #180176 11/09/08 09:45 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 876
I always thought it had a hyphen, though, as in "three-dog night". The band can be forgiven for leaving it out... :0)

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Funny. I never hear the hyphen when folks say it.

Faldage #180196 11/10/08 04:06 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 557
M
addict
Offline
addict
M
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 557
I suppose that someone would almost run the words together - circa "threedog night" - if they were actually using the term rather than the band name, but I've never heard anyone actually say it.

Where ... at? only bothers me in only in online circumstances where people are being as brief as possible and then add that extra in, e.g. "where r u at" or even worse "wr u at". ;-)

Myridon #180293 11/13/08 07:25 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 23
A
stranger
Offline
stranger
A
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 23
Of course I can imagine grammar without punctuation, but we have become hooked on writing and it has come to affect our speech. Just as any Western melody from Bach to pop 'implies' a sequence of chords, anything we say implies its written appearance.

Just because the punctuation only adds convenience, I don't find that it follows that it is not an integral part of our grammatical constructions. This sentence implies a semicolon after its ninth word it looks odd without it. It would be worse if we did away with full stops and capitals; the grammar could be otherwise perfect but confusion would surely set in.

latishya #180468 11/20/08 06:51 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6
B
stranger
Offline
stranger
B
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6
I've heard/read that whistles are/were used in the Canary Islands because it carries better than voice because of the volcanic rock(?). Haven't verified it (I read it back in the days when you could trust what you read, at least in the Weekly Reader :-E)

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,331
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 854 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,542
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,916
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5