Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
#164348 12/20/06 01:59 AM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,561
Likes: 1
W
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,561
Likes: 1
Quote:

Is there a mathematician in the house?

Q: Can you think of a good anagram for "Banach-Tarski" ?
A: It's "Banach-Tarski Banach-Tarski" ...

(explanation here , for the non-mathematical but curious)




For a more graphic (though perhaps not more enlightening) representation of the matter...(click here)

#164349 12/21/06 01:41 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,529
T
veteran
Offline
veteran
T
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,529
Quote:

Great Milo! You done is taught gramma to suck eggs! Now you wanna teach her how to lay one?

I understand the joke behind wofa's so-called pun and I'd lay odds GT does, too. But do you understand how to get the bogo on the spheres?


Wha'd I say, Faldotage? Math is bunk. How long is the coastline of Florida? Look close and you can double it, look closer and it will streeeeeeeeeeach to the moon.

Trickier, though, are mathematical excursions into infinity.
Take one infinity for example; double it, and then multiply it by seven less the number of hookers in Reno and go fish...and your product we still be only one infinity. But not finally. It is also true that you also have an infinite number of infinities. Go figure.

Last edited by themilum; 12/21/06 04:00 AM.
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,561
Likes: 1
W
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,561
Likes: 1
Ah, me. Didn't mean to open a can of worms.

"Infinity" is not a number, and cannot always be manipulated as everyday numbers can. Sometimes this leads to conclusions that sound counter-intuitive; common sense learned from numbers does not always apply.

Long and loud and contentious arguments all to often are based on the unhappy fact that the parties are not defining the term the same way.

Onward! Look at the original self-referential wordplay and smile. Next factoid, please.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,372
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 381 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,561
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,919
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5