|About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us|
You are not logged in. [Log In] Wordsmith.org » Forums » General Topics » Q&A about words » prioritise over Register User Forum List Calendar Active Topics Search FAQ
#159018 - 04/24/06 09:40 AM prioritise over
Is this a valid construction? 'To prioritise one action over another ...'? It sounds a little funny to me. I feel it should just be 'to prioritise sth.' (e.g., simply 'The files were prioritised'). I have read numerous adjectives used in connection with prioritise (e.g. to prioritise one thing against another). I think it perhaps should be stated simply as 'to give sth. priority, rather than another' is what I'm getting at. I get the feeling that these corporate usages get progressively foggier. Any usages comments appreciated.
#159019 - 04/24/06 10:01 AM Re: prioritise over
I'm with you, "over another" seems redundant, since that's what prioritize means, no?_________________________
formerly known as etaoin...
#159020 - 04/24/06 11:10 AM Re: prioritise over
Loc: Dallas, TX
I don't know... It seems to me if your working with items in the middle of a list 123...ABC...xyz and changing the priority of C with respect to B but leaving the priority of A the same, i.e. not necessarily moving C to the top of the list but just anywhere above B that "prioritizing C over B" provides a lot more information than just "prioritizing C". The same applies for "de-prioritizing B".
#159021 - 04/24/06 11:23 AM Re: prioritise over
Loc: lower upstate New York
I agree with Myridon. I hate corporate-speak as much as the next guy, but how else are you gonna say, in as few words as possible, that you will work on C before B?
#159022 - 04/24/06 11:35 AM Re: prioritise over
Do C before B._________________________
formerly known as etaoin...
#159023 - 04/24/06 11:48 AM Re: prioritise over
But c'mon, you can surely see that 'prioritise' also codes additional information? For me, it signals resource issues, not just timelines: for example, I might get on with priority #2, #3, #4 and #5, having set in motion a longer-term action on the top priority. It is a truism of business to learn to discriminate between the urgent and the important; they rarely coincide.
Forum Stats 8909 Members
Max Online: 3341 @ 12/09/11 02:15 PM
Newest Members Rockyhud220, L82cannon, tien170164, ramulusri, Delaisa
8909 Registered Users
Who's Online 1 registered (Jackie), 114 Guests and 3 Spiders online. Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters (30 Days)
wofahulicodoc 79 endymion6 76 LukeJavan8 62 May 25 BranShea 3 Markubus5 2 Tromboniator 1 peter_in_boston 1 Hansje1980 1
wwh 13858 Faldage 13803 Jackie 11613 tsuwm 10537 LukeJavan8 8046 Buffalo Shrdlu 7210 AnnaStrophic 6511 wofahulicodoc 6418 Wordwind 6296 of troy 5400
Board Rules · Mark all read Contact Us · Wordsmith.org · Top
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.
Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat
© 1994-2016 Wordsmith