|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210 |
I played around with a multiplicative Fibonacci series once. pretty neat. I have no idea whether it approached Phi or not. I guess I took artistic license to get it started: 1 1 2 2 4 8 32 256 8192 2,097,152 17,179,869,184 36,028,797,019,000,000 618,970,019,640,000,000,000,000,000
formerly known as etaoin...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210 |
ok, how does this series relate to mine above?
1 1 1 3 4 6 10
formerly known as etaoin...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 164
member
|
member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 164 |
Ack!!! Numbers!!! [[runs away freaking out]] Numbers bad! Numbers make my head hurt! <---Is 75% dyslexic.
Rev. Alimae
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803 |
Quote:
75% dyslexic.
And the other 35% is mathephobic.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379 |
That leaves 15%. What's my bid?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290 |
So, 75, 35, and 15 are not numbers? What are they chopped digits?
Ceci n'est pas un seing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526 |
I don't spend a lot of time thinking about it, but here are some random comments. I don't have any particular knowledge of it, but of course that doesn't prevent me from having and expressing strong opinions.
1. I believe that intelligence exists. I do not know that IQ actually measures real intelligence. I do think it is a proxy, but only within a very narrow range - what I would call trivial intelligence. Often we take other tests which are proxies of a proxy, so to speak - the GRE, SAT, etc.
2. There are usually several components - logic, pattern detection/matching, and verbal. Often the components are mixed. Often there are clear cultural components to the test and almost always there are subtle cultural biases. That doesn't mean the tests are useless or that they "don't mean anything."
3. I don't think that all cultures are equal or even equivalent - with regard to promoting intelligence or probably much of anything else. That doesn't mean that I don't think there intelligent - even brilliant - people in every culture. But I do think that those cultures which value it (ACTUALLY value it, as opposed to just saying that they value it) will promote it.
4. Intelligence of nearly any variety isn't always a good thing for the individual.
5. I'm vaguely familiar with Howard Gardner's ideas on multiple intelligences. This seems a good start to me in that it considers intelligence to be a vector rather than a scalar. It's a good start, but I suspect the idea could be expanded.
6. Most people consider "wisdom" very roughly to be how well one can translate intelligence into action. I'll settle for this definition; however, most people consider wisdom to be some sort of higher order function than intelligence, while I just consider it to be another axis of the intelligence vector.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,627
Members9,187
|
Most Online3,341 Dec 9th, 2011
|
|
0 members (),
122
guests, and
5
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|