Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
Re: I thought that I had found yet another potentially enjoyable chat forum ruined by ...nitpicking ...

we have some nitpicker's extrordinare here.. but they are not vicious. just pendantic!

so, if nitpicking is pet peeve.. well expect to get petted (or peeved!)
(i am glad you came back!)




#147272 09/05/05 01:27 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 38
U
ullrich Offline OP
newbie
OP Offline
newbie
U
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 38
Good.

In that case, I would like to point out the following:

The word 'hazard' is a transitive verb and must take a direct object. For example, 'wear' -- another transitive verb -- is never used without an object, as in "I like to wear."

Transitive verbs without objects leave one asking "what?"

Take, for example, the recent riposte:

"I would like to hazard a more pointless exercise for anyone who has anything better to do with their idle time."

In this sentence, the object of 'hazard' is a more pointless exercise. One is left wondering what more pointless exercise the poster is going to hazard. None is given, and, in such cases, the statement itself must stand in, by default, for the missing object.

This is unintentionally and disastrously ironic: the more pointless exercise the poster hazards is his own criticism of that exercise.

I appreciate that this is a forum about lexicon, and not syntax, but I thought it was worth mentioning.

#147273 09/05/05 02:06 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379
I
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
I
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379
" . . . appreciate that this is a forum about lexicon, and not syntax, but I thought it was worth mentioning.'

lol.

Syntax is good! I, Hazard.


#147274 09/05/05 02:11 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Good.

In that case, I would like to point out the following:
Hey--now don't be takin' too many daggoned liberties, Bub!
So glad you're back! [hug] That guy has cost us several members, and I just got enraged when I saw he'd managed it yet again.


#147275 09/05/05 02:28 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
"I would like to hazard a more pointless exercise for anyone who has anything better to do with their idle time."

<mutter>
must have dropped inexplicably out of self-editing/effacing loop...</mutter>

-ron (lending an ear) obvious


#147276 09/05/05 02:39 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
I appreciate that this is a forum about lexicon, and not syntax, but I thought it was worth mentioning.

Just a nit to pick, but the sentence is syntactically correct, as you pointed out. The fault lies in the pragmatics of moss's posting.

[Edited typo.]


Ceci n'est pas un seing.
#147277 09/05/05 02:55 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
> The fault lies in the pragamatics of moss's posting.

one must assume you meant pragmatics and not pangrammatics, as I don't spot a q in moss's post.
-joe (nitwit) friday



Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,290
pragamatics / presto chango / perigrammaticists

'umble zmjezhd as in PIE



Ceci n'est pas un seing.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
'umble zmjezhd as in PIE


#147280 09/05/05 10:26 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 38
U
ullrich Offline OP
newbie
OP Offline
newbie
U
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 38
Yes. The syntax is correct, but only if the poster meant to say: "Here is a more pointless exercise." I am sure he did not mean to say that, so I would maintain that it is in fact a question of synax : a case of syntatical malapropism.

When correct syntax in the wrong context conveys the wrong meaning then it is not "corrrect" syntax, no more than "defecation" is the right word in the sentence "I am suing her for defecation" although the word "defecation" itself is "correct" the intended word is "defamation" (unless of course... but no, let's no go there).




Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,360
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
1 members (wofahulicodoc), 615 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,556
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,919
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5