Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3
T
timr Offline OP
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
T
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3
Dearest linguaphiles,

I've set up a (very) simple website which generates Spoonerisms from an input phrase, at fabelbish.com - the spoonerism generator

It goes through the following process (roughly):

1. Strips spaces from the beginning and end of the input, removes control charaters (linefeed etc), and makes everything lower-case.

2. Separates the input into words (by breaking it up wherever a space is found)

3. Any words which begin with a vowel or are only one letter long are left alone.

4. Any words longer than one letter and begin with a consonant go through the following process:

i) Any letters before the first vowel are extracted
ii) The 'starts' of these words are shuffled around
iii) The words are re-assembled with the starts shuffled

5. The sentence is re-formed (like a fish finger) with all the words in (3) left as they were, and all the others put back with the starts shuffled around.

6. The first character is capitalised, as is so often neglected on the net nowadays... (!)

They're not really 'true' spoonerisms all the time - true spoonerisms involve swapping the sounds from the start of words, not just the letters, to make other valid words with correct spelling,

e.g. my program does "tool kits" > "kool tits". A proper spoonerism would be "cool tits".

I would massively appreciate any feedback or suggestions for enhancements to the process described above.

Thanks!

Tim.


Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,788
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,788
Sis ting theems fo work after its own thashion.


Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,385
P
veteran
Offline
veteran
P
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,385
A proper spoonerism would be "cool tits"

That's probably not the best example of a "proper spoonerism" for use in this forum, timr.

Just tryin' to be helpful.



Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3
T
timr Offline OP
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
T
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3
Thanks plutarch, but I don't follow your line of thinking. Why is cool/kool not a good example? I was trying to think of something simple to demonstrate my point that transposing letters doesn't always give an output which is spelt correctly, even if it it is phoenetically valid.


Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 74
S
journeyman
Offline
journeyman
S
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 74
You have to understand that plutarch is his own self-appointed arbiter of manners and good taste in these unmoderated forums. You'll just have to listen hard to him... or not.

The Lone Haranguer


The Lone Haranguer
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,385
P
veteran
Offline
veteran
P
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,385
Why is cool/kool not a good example? I was trying to think of something simple to demonstrate my point that transposing letters doesn't always give an output which is spelt correctly, even if it it is phoenetically valid.

I don't have any objection to "cool tits" personally, fabelbish. But, despite what snoot suggests, I am not "the arbiter" of taste around here, and one cannot even satirize Paris Hilton here without being taken as a fan of Paris Hilton and, therefore, a person of prurient interests.

Actually, I don't have anything against Paris Hilton personally. She is a creature of her times and it is her fans whom I satirized in "Confessions of an Heirhead", not Paris herself.

Paris is certainly a brassy, opportunistic vamp, but what can you say of the parents who name their daughters after her?*

As for snoot, well, snoot proclaims that she is "The Lone Haranguer". Snoot has averaged about one post per month over the past 3 1/2 years but snoot seems to have picked up the pace recently.

Paris Hilton: She can't milk a cow, but boy can she milk America.

The name Paris is No. 156 on the list of most popular baby names, up from No. 508 in 2001, according to the Social Security Administration.


Assembling celebrity Paris Hilton taps her talent for manufacturing fame
Jaimee Rose
The Arizona Republic
Jun. 18, 2005 12:00 AM



Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3
T
timr Offline OP
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
T
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3
I appreciate I'm in no position to slap wrists here as the extreme newbie, but aren't Paris Hilton, and snoot's 'post count' slightly off-topic? Is there an assumption on this forum that the more you have to say, the more your opinion counts? As an outsider coming here for some constructive feedback, it looks like I've wandered into a fitch bite.


Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,385
P
veteran
Offline
veteran
P
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,385
it looks like I've wandered into a fitch bite

Could be timr.

No reflection on your program, however.

fitch bite

Interesting term. Do you know the origin?







Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
while most of the current poster are adults, as a 'general rule' (since, there are no real rules) we enjoy wit.. and a cleverly turned phrase. one that has us laughing before we blush, and one that we feel comfortable seeing in print.

there is a forum for AWAD in schools, and some teacher use this site, and some very G rated publication encourage their readers to join AWAD--and well we are generally not interested in bawdy talk (yeah, it happens, but like i said, we enjoy more wit than tit(tlating) talk.

fitch bite, and the tool kit.. well --if these are the "Prime" examples -- they are just not witty enough.. they come across as attempts to be rude. (well they do to me.. )

yes, the reverand spooner made so extremely embarassing remarks--(perhaps he secretly harbored pruient interests.)
we general don't. we are mostly grown ups, and know a vulgar and scatalogical and profane words.. and elect, in general not to use them. that is.

we chose, in general to keep the level of conversation one that is above that level.

but we are human, and yes, we occational will have a bit of word play that is vulgar or low brow. we just don't aim to do that.
(by the way, the imperial we? well-- it's a style.. really i am speaking for myself--and the opinions expressed in this post are mine, all mine..
(it is my opinion that others here behave the way i described when i used the word we--but i certainly don't speak for anyone but myself!)


#145623 07/30/05 07:57 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
> imperial we

once, while I was working as a waiter, I had a customer say, "we would like..." (he was dining alone). I asked if that was the royal we, and he said, "no, I just took that."

heh.


welcome timr.



formerly known as etaoin...
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,330
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 1,577 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,542
wofahulicodoc 10,541
LukeJavan8 9,916
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5