Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#133293 09/22/04 05:19 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379
I
Pooh-Bah
OP Offline
Pooh-Bah
I
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379
Leafing through the Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics, I found a term that was, I think, attributed to Yeats. It concerned -- or named -- his theory that a poet doesn't need or desire to nail everything down, nor to understand anything through and through. That is, I take it, a poet acknowledges the impossibility of so doing, and writes within that limitation -- or within the opening of that freedom, if you will. A n y w a y . . . I did not, alas, write down the term, find today that it would be useful, and wondered if any of you all might know, and be willing to part with it for two groschen. Or an opera. Whichever comes first.

Thanks.

IP


#133294 09/22/04 10:22 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,891
B
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
B
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,891
Ahhhhhhhhhhhh, evil, evil insel!!!

You had me all interested, and I thought you were going to tell us what the word was after that good explanation and now you don't have it. Ahhhhhhh.

[Stomping off to the corner to pout - e]


#133295 09/24/04 03:34 AM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379
I
Pooh-Bah
OP Offline
Pooh-Bah
I
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379
Well, Bel, when I do find it, I will be sure to let you know.


#133296 09/25/04 02:30 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
G
addict
Offline
addict
G
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
It concerned -- or named -- his theory that a poet doesn't need or desire to nail everything down, nor to understand anything through and through. That is, I take it, a poet acknowledges the impossibility of so doing, and writes within that limitation

The term you are looking for is "intuetics", inselpeter.** Nowadays it is referred to as "obscurantism" ... without any credit to Yeats. Defn. "A style in art and literature characterized by deliberate vagueness or obliqueness." [A-H]

And St. Paul said it best, long before Yeats, methinks. [Nostradamus and the priestesses of the Delphic Oracle had a leg up on Yeats, as well.]

to see through a glass darkly
To see “through a glass”—a mirror—“darkly” is to have an obscure or imperfect vision of reality. The expression comes from the writings of the Apostle Paul*; he explains that we do not now see clearly, but at the end of time, we will do so.

http://www.bartleby.com/59/1/throughaglas.html

* 1 Corinthians 13:12
For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.

**
"I still, however, tend to see the tower as a symbol of “reason,” reason as opposed to “intuition.” The rational thinking of scientists and scholars is continually opposed to the inspiration or intuition of the artist in Yeats’ poetry, as it was in almost all forms of romanticism. The tower is a symbol I will need to re-examine and come back to later. Maybe next time around I’ll argue that the tower symbolizes Yeats’ view that art should be practiced as an act of life, not removed from the world."

http://lorenwebster.net/In_a_Dark_Time/archives/000111.html


#133297 09/25/04 09:39 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379
I
Pooh-Bah
OP Offline
Pooh-Bah
I
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,379
Thanks, much. I *thought* it was right by "Inuit Poetry" (itself an interesting entry), but somehow, I couldn't find it.

"obscurantism" seems a bit, er, on the contrary, derogatory...no?


#133298 09/26/04 08:27 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
G
addict
Offline
addict
G
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
"obscurantism" seems a bit, er, on the contrary, derogatory...no?

That depends on what you're trying to obscure, Inselpeter.

Sometimes it's the only way to get satire published.

As you indicated in your original post, Inselpeter, it is not Yeat's label you are looking for. It's a commentator's label. That commentator may be no more credible in summing up Yeat's oeuvre than you or I.

"Intuetics" fits the bill, quite nicely, wouldn't you say?

If "poetics" is the study of "poetry", then "intuetics" is the study of "intuition". The conclusion is irresistible.

Two groshen, or an opera, whichever comes first. I think I'll settle for one groschen upfront, Inselpeter ... tho a "groschen" is "Inuit Poetry" to me.

#133299 09/26/04 08:43 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 34
T
newbie
Offline
newbie
T
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 34
a "groschen" is "Inuit Poetry" to me

Let's not get intuit now, Grapho.


#133300 09/27/04 04:19 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,891
B
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
B
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,891
"Intuetics" I like this word.

Can you say, his work is "intuetically" inclined?


#133301 09/27/04 10:54 PM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Z
Zed Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Z
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
I wish I'd known that back in school. "It's not rubbish, sir. I was being intuetical."
A very handy word indeed.


#133302 09/28/04 11:32 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
G
addict
Offline
addict
G
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
Can you say, his work is "intuetically" inclined?

You can if he works for an outdoor cafe and he rolls out the awning before a rainstorm ... without consulting a barometer.




#133303 09/28/04 02:23 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,439
W
wow Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,439
Ya gotta give props to the Irish - intuetically is so much more mellifluous than obscurism.
On an oblique connection to this thread you have given me an excellent word for explaining how I lived my life - (so far) - when people talk about their Five Year Plans and Ten Year plans - i can say I prefer to live intuetically.


#133304 09/30/04 04:09 AM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 133
J
member
Offline
member
J
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 133
Writing done intuetically may seem obscure to some, but clear enough (as clear as intended?) to others. Often poetry and sometimes prose.
Intuetically sounds like a genuine "leap" to a basic meaning or expression--Obscurantism sounds like a conscious attempt to make understanding difficult. Muddying the waters or turning on a fog machine, so to speak.


#133305 09/30/04 10:48 PM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Z
Zed Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Z
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Obscurantism sounds like a conscious attempt to make understanding difficult. Muddying the waters or turning on a fog machine, so to speak.
Or making political speeches.


#133306 10/01/04 03:34 AM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 133
J
member
Offline
member
J
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 133
YES!


#133307 10/01/04 10:41 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
G
addict
Offline
addict
G
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
Obscurantism sounds like a conscious attempt to make understanding difficult ... Or making political speeches

The Bush campaign puts out a regular report on John Kerry's stumperizing known as "the Boston Fog". But, some say, after the debate last night, the fog has lifted.

The "Boston Fog" reminds me of "bomfog" which doesn't have anything to do with "fog" exactly.

Nelson Rockefeller used to end all his speeches with the homily "in the brotherhood of man in the fatherhood of God". The press tired of this after awhile so they acronymed it "bomfog" [which really should be written "bomfoG", I suppose].

Of course, "bomfog" isn't "spin" which is "obscurantism" practised as a political art.

"Spin" spins you around so you end up looking in another direction. "Bomfog" just rolls over you and puts you to sleep.

The best example of "spin" last night came not from the Presidential contenders but rather at the end of CNN's coverage of that "debate" from the President's leading spinmeister.

During his presentation, the President had said [or clearly implied, I can't remember which] that the U.S. had "locked up" the infamous black-marketeer who had sold nuclear technologies to Iran and North Korea.

Twice, at the end of CNN's coverage, Wolf Blitzer asked the President's spinmeister if it was accurate to say that this black-marketeer was "locked up" when he was roaming freely all over Pakistan.

Twice the spinmeister in reply said that the black-marketeer's trading in Weapons of Mass Destruction was "shattered" and the Bush Administration had also achieved success in closing down Libya's WMD arsenal.

Wolf didn't have time to ask the question a third time. Now that's spinmeistery at its best!



#133308 10/01/04 09:18 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,529
T
veteran
Offline
veteran
T
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,529
Edit: Quote provided by themilum...

President Bush: "And we've been effective. We busted the A.Q. Khan network. This was a proliferator out of Pakistan that was selling secrets to places like North Korea and Libya. We convinced Libya to disarm. "

Take note grapho, Bush did not say "locked up". Wolf Blitzer said "locked up. And you, grapho, eagerly perpetuated the CNN spin.

Will you now please apologize to we good folk on this board?
_______________________________________________

Great idea, grapho, let's semantically dissect the debate last night. I'll go second...

What exactly did Kerry mean when he used the term " Global Test"?
As in...

John Kerry: "But if and when you do it, Jim, you have to do it in a way that passes the test, that passes the global test where your countrymen, your people understand fully why you're doing what you're doing and you can prove to the world that you did it for legitimate reasons."

Who, for god-help-us example, adjudicates this "Global Test"?

Jeez!


#133309 10/01/04 10:59 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Who … adjudicates this "Global Test"?

The people of the Globe.

We're all in this together, white boy.


#133310 10/02/04 12:28 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,529
T
veteran
Offline
veteran
T
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,529
Don't call me "boy", Faldage, call me curious.

Does the Kerrian term "global test" resonate pleasingly to your keen politically educated ears?



#133311 10/02/04 01:45 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
G
addict
Offline
addict
G
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
Will you now please apologize to we good folk on this board?

themilum, I do apologize for echoing Wolf Blizter in saying "locked up" when the President said "busted up".

Back at home, when the police make a "bust", the bad guys end up in "lock up".

In Pakistan, the "bad guys" end up roaming the country with Osama Bin Laden.

If that means we have "busted up" their terrorism, without actually "locking them up", then I apologize for my imprecision.

#133312 10/02/04 02:14 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
G
addict
Offline
addict
G
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
without consulting a barometer

Let's make it a real test .. without consultng a barometer, and without consulting the sky.


#133313 10/02/04 03:03 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,529
T
veteran
Offline
veteran
T
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,529
Ah grapho, grapho! You just won't go willingly to your proper gaffe fate. Yes of course, "to bust" means to arrest a single person, but "to bust up" means "to break up", as in a gang. But you knew that, grapho, now didn't you?

So why do you feel the necessity to mealy-mouth your apology to these upstanding erudite people here on this word-parsing board? Can you not simply say...
___________________________________"I have spinned, my brethern, but now I repent?"




#133314 10/02/04 03:26 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
G
addict
Offline
addict
G
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
Can you not simply say ... "I have spinned, my brethern, but now I repent?"

"Consider the lilies of the field", themilum. "They toil not, neither do they spin."


#133315 10/02/04 04:13 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
G
addict
Offline
addict
G
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
upstanding erudite people here on this word-parsing board?




#133316 10/02/04 04:15 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
G
addict
Offline
addict
G
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
upstanding erudite people here on this word-parsing board?

Errugo again, Grapho.

[Just funnin' with ya, Carps. ]



#133317 10/02/04 09:46 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,529
T
veteran
Offline
veteran
T
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,529
Remember back, graho, back in '82, when you by trickery won the one-upmanship trophy of the graduating class of Springfield High?

Well, you graho, are still the king, I give up.


#133318 10/02/04 11:43 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
G
addict
Offline
addict
G
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
re "trickery won the one-upmanship trophy ... Well, you grapho, are still the king

Well, thank you, themilum ... [I think ].

BTW how do you win a one-upmanship trophy by "trickery"? If your one-upping isn't on the up and up, how can anyone judge it?

I think you're thinking of the come-uppance trophy, themilum.


#133319 10/02/04 11:54 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
G
addict
Offline
addict
G
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 619
Can you not simply say ... "I have spinned ..."

Not without putting any spin on it, themilum.

BTW here's a comprehensive definition of "spin" from today's Independent of London.

Headline: "The operation went according to plan. Shame about the spin"

"Spin is briefing journalists so that they report, without attribution, messages the Government wants put across but does not want to say. Spin is suggesting to journalists the coded messages in what was actually said. Spin is putting a gloss on the facts, turning a deficit into a surplus, and previously announced spending into "new" money. It is repackaging old policies into new ones."

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/media/story.jsp?story=568245

For the latest on Paris, visit "Confessions of an Heirhead". We put it out when Paris puts out.


Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,351
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 804 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,549
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,918
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5