Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#123114 02/17/04 10:00 PM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
tsuwm Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
(or new entries in the OED)

gatekeeping - [a.]That controls passage through a gate. Later also in extended use: that controls access to something or monitors and selects information, etc.
1979 Washington Post (Nexis) 2 Feb. 6 The museum has always accepted everything that came in... We're in the process of..junking the trash and setting up a gatekeeping system that will limit what comes in to what is useful. 1997 Press-Enterprise (Riverside, California) (Nexis) 9 Sept. D1 A woman who selects an OB-GYN as her primary-care doctor has direct access to that physician without having to go through another ‘gatekeeping’ physician.

draft entry Sept. 2003 © Oxford University Press 2004


#123115 02/17/04 10:13 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
W
wwh Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
Somebody doesn't know much about medical specialties.
I pity the woman who has as her "primary care physician" an
OBGYN specialist when she wants care for something outside
his specialty. I believe all the specialty boards bar their
members from general practice. Let's not quibble about a board for Family Care Physicians.


#123116 02/18/04 04:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
W
wwh Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
There is a type of gatekeeping that is not permissible:
"goal tending" in basketball.


#123117 02/18/04 04:51 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526

Another kind of gatekeeper comes to mind - Maxwell's demon.

k



#123118 02/18/04 05:17 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
W
wwh Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
Guilty edit: I am embarrassed that FF thought article below
was mine. It was not. Mea maxima culpa.

Maxwell's Demon is a simple beast: he sits at the door of your office in summertime and watches the molecules wandering back and forth. Those which move faster than some limit he only lets pass out of the room, and those moving slower than some limit he only lets pass into the room. He doesn't need to expend energy to do this -- he simply closes a lightweight shutter whenever he spots a molecule coming that he wants to deflect. The molecule then just bounces off the shutter and returns the way it came. All he needs, it would appear, is patience, remarkably good eyesight and speedly reflexes, and the brains to figure out how to herd brainless molecules.

The result of the Demon's work is cool, literally. Since the average speed at which the molecules in the air zoom around is what we perceive as the temperature of the air, the Demon will by excluding high-speed molecules from the room and admitting only low-speed molecules cause the average speed and hence temperature to drop. He is an air-conditioner that needs no power supply.

Alas, Maxwell's Demon is an impossible beast. He violates The Second Law, because the net effect of his manipulations is to transfer energy from inside the room to outside the room with no waste whatsoever. Oh well. If you would like a detailed exorcism of the Demon, the best is contained in Science and Information Theory (Academic Press, New York, 1956) in a beautiful article by Leon Brillouin, a giant of twentieth century physics. The essence of the refutation is that the Demon cannot see the molecules unless he uses a flashlight, and thus spends energy. Since the crux of the matter is the information the Demon must possess, you may see why the article is contained in a book on "Information Theory". And indeed it turns out there are deep connections between the Second Law and information theory -- the science of knowing when you know.

A more modern version of the Demon is this: consider a diode rectifier, a device which you are told in elementary electronics class passes electrical current (the motion of electrons) in only one direction. In such a device it would appear that the random bumping around of electrons (that's a form of heat) would lead to a net flow of electrons in the allowed direction, as electrons that bumped into the diode junction going the wrong way would bounce back, and the those going the right way would pass through. This is just like Maxwell's Demon using the random motion of the molecules to achieve a net flow of fast molecules.

Hey, but a net flow of electrons through the diode is an electrical current! You can apparently generate a macroscopic flow of energy (a current) out of nothing but pure heat. (This is like the random jiggling motions of the box conspiring to reform the bouncing motion.) We could gang six million of these widgets together and dump them into the Pacific Ocean, a practically inexhaustible source of heat, and apparently generate electrical power forever for free.

Don't buy stock yet. It's another Demon, and another fraud.

There are many perpetual motion machines of the second kind, each more fiendish and subtlely flawed than the last. Luckily for the Patent Office The Second Law simply forbids each and every one.

Incidentally, a perpetual motion machine of the first kind is one which violates The First Law, by creating energy out of thin air. These are a little easier to spot -- if I claim to turn my airplane propeller with a rubber band and to wind the rubber band with a windmill mounted on the airplane wings, most folks even without the benefit of a course in thermodynamics would decline my offer of a free ride right away.


-



#123119 02/18/04 05:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
J
veteran
Offline
veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,475
A great send-up of perpetual motion machines and schemes to square the circle is Augustus de Morgan's Budget of Paradoxes.


#123120 02/18/04 05:53 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,526

Dr. Bill, you are a marvel. Excellent explanation.
I haven't read a lot on info theory - a bit, but not
a lot. Thermo was among my least favorite classes at
school.

Anyway, the main stuff I've read are
http://geocities.com/elbillaf/read_021.html and
http://geocities.com/elbillaf/read_029.html and
a few articles sprinkled through the years.

I've got a few others on my list (and I've added yours).

I always thought it was interesting that the information in a system was given by an equation called The Entropy Equation. Raisbeck explains this well.

k




#123121 02/18/04 06:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858
W
wwh Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 13,858


Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,351
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 775 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,549
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,918
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5