Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#11365 - 11/28/00 04:12 PM redundant pairings  
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538
tsuwm Offline
Carpal Tunnel
tsuwm  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538
this too shall pass
I came across the phrase "vim and vigor" the other day and, struck by its repetitive nature, was reminded of when "kit and caboodle" came up here a while back. have we covered (nearly) equivalent pairings?


#11366 - 11/28/00 04:38 PM Re: redundant pairings  
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,788
Father Steve Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Father Steve  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,788
Seattle, Washington, USA
A professor with whom I studied long, long ago told me that, when there appears to be a redundancy in such a pairing, it is often because one Anglo-Saxon (Germanic) word has been coupled with one Norman (Latin) word. He pointed to a dozen examples of this in the 1549 and 1552 Books of Common Prayer, although it was so long ago, I don't recall the examples.


#11367 - 11/28/00 07:09 PM Re: redundant pairings  
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Jackie Online content
Jackie  Online Content

Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Louisville, Kentucky
This is not exactly the same, but...flesh and blood.
Hale and hearty. Part and parcel? Hack and slash.
Far and wide (maybe).





#11368 - 11/28/00 08:12 PM Re: redundant pairings  
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 347
Marty Offline
enthusiast
Marty  Offline
enthusiast

Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 347
Melbourne, Australia
Prim and proper.
Neat and tidy.

It occurs to me, though, that there may be a sub-class of these expressions where the words are (almost) always coupled, such as "spick and span". Then again, if they can't be used separately, perhaps they don't qualify as redundant pairings??


#11369 - 11/28/00 08:13 PM Re: redundant pairings  
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
of troy Offline
Carpal Tunnel
of troy  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
rego park
kith and kin?

and in the negitive, neither fair nor foul? (so it what?)


#11370 - 11/28/00 08:19 PM Re: redundant pairings  
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,409
Max Quordlepleen Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Max Quordlepleen  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,409
Ship-shape and Bristol fashion?


#11371 - 11/28/00 09:11 PM Re: redundant pairings  
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538
tsuwm Offline
Carpal Tunnel
tsuwm  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,538
this too shall pass
>Ship-shape and Bristol fashion?
now there's one that's not often heard in the Minnesota woods.


#11372 - 11/29/00 02:19 AM Re: redundant pairings  
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
AnnaStrophic Offline
Carpal Tunnel
AnnaStrophic  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
lower upstate New York
rack and ruin.


(Bristol fashion?? Background, please)


#11373 - 11/29/00 07:32 AM Re: redundant pairings  
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 11
drum Offline
stranger
drum  Offline
stranger

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 11
Central BC, Canada
How 'bout rip and tear?


#11374 - 11/29/00 07:52 AM Re: redundant pairings  
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,409
Max Quordlepleen Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Max Quordlepleen  Offline
Carpal Tunnel

Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,409
In reply to:

(Bristol fashion? Background please)


The following sounds plausible:
"Bristol: Ship-shape and Bristol fashion means that everything is neat and tidy. This saying comes from two aspects of the old Bristol docks in the days before the Floating Harbour was established in the 1830s. Bristol had, and still has, one of the largest differences of water level between ebb and flood in the World, something like 10 metres. At low tide ships in the harbour, if not really properly constructed and laden, would either break their backs or their cargoes would shift. Because of this, Bristol ships were always first class in these respects, hence the saying. The Floating Harbour was constructed by Brunel in order to overcome the tide problem. "
source: http://www.briggs13.fsnet.co.uk/book/b.htm




Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Jackie 

Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,877
Posts223,590
Members9,003
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
bpatterson0032, Aladitya_khan, JdawgGaming, Hiteshi, JaneJane
9003 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 51 guests, and 2 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters(All Time)
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,538
LukeJavan8 8,881
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2017 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.013s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 2.7253 MB (Peak: 2.8600 MB) Zlib disabled. Server Time: 2017-05-29 04:03:54 UTC