Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#111529 09/05/03 01:40 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Jackie Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
A friend told me about this word, Father Steve, and I am wondering whether you have ever used it. (I shall copy what my friend looked up about it.) The word is affeer.
the two quick definitions given on onelook.com were:

(v. t.) To assess or reduce, as an arbitrary penalty or amercement, to a certain and reasonable sum.
(v. t.) To confirm; to assure.



Here's a quote from dictionary.com:
affeer

\Af*feer"\, v. t. [OF. aforer, afeurer, to tax, appraise, assess, fr. L. ad + forum market, court of justice, in LL. also meaning price.] 1. To confirm; to assure. [Obs.] ``The title is affeered.'' --Shak.

2. (Old Law) To assess or reduce, as an arbitrary penalty or amercement, to a certain and reasonable sum.

Amercements . . . were affeered by the judges. --Blackstone.


Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, © 1996, 1998 MICRA, Inc.






#111530 09/05/03 03:25 AM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,788
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,788
The term "affeer" is no longer used in law and, if it were, lawyers' brains would revert to pre-law-school mush trying to figure out what it means.

Affeer has two distinct meanings, oddly enough.

When Shakespeare uses it in Macbeth (IV.3)...

Bleed, bleed, poor country!
Great tyranny! lay thou thy basis sure,
For goodness dare not cheque thee: wear thou
thy wrongs;
The title is affeer'd! Fare thee well, lord:
I would not be the villain that thou think'st
For the whole space that's in the tyrant's grasp,
And the rich East to boot.

... he uses it to mean "assured" or "secured."

The Common Law meaning was quite different. At Common Law, there were three amounts of money which a court (or crown) might require a subject to pay: damages, fines and amercements.

Damages arose from a civil lawsuit in which one party proved that another party had damaged it or its interests, which damage was then compensated by requiring the damaging party to pay damages.

Fines arose from misdemeanors where, if it could be shown that a subject did a prohibited thing, a specified amount of money could be required of the offending person, which amount was paid to the crown (or lord) for the insult/injury to the majesty's dignity.

Amercements were monetary penalties imposed by a court for misdemeanors where no amount was specified by statute, thus the court was permitted, in a sense, to make up the penalty. One was at the court's (or crown's or lord's) mercy and thus the term amercement.

The act of imposing, in the first instance, or amending, on appeal, an amercement was called affeering or affeerment or some such term.

We don't do a lot of that in the 21st Century Colonies, but there are parallels to this antecedent of imposing civil penalties for minor wrongs, e.g. variable fines for traffic violations (sometimes called infractions) which do not constitute crimes.



#111531 09/05/03 11:04 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Jackie Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Wow--thank you!

Amercements were monetary penalties imposed by a court for misdemeanors
So this is different from, say, awards for mental suffering or punitive damages, I gather.


#111532 09/05/03 11:17 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,788
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,788
Awards for mental suffering and punitive damages flow out of civil causes of action, not misdemeanors, where it is one party (usually a person) suing another party (usually a person) for a civil wrong, e.g. a trespass, a breach of contract, a tortious damage to person or property. Misdemeanors, on the other hand, offend the crown or the lord or the law in general, and are punishable by the imposition of a duty to pay a sum, not to an injured party but to the crown or the lord or the court. Make sense?



#111533 09/06/03 04:17 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Jackie Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Yep; figured. Thanks! :-)



Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,330
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 995 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
tsuwm 10,542
wofahulicodoc 10,541
LukeJavan8 9,916
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5