Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
#109677 08/10/03 01:19 AM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
W
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
It's late. I need to be in bed. But I've been meaning to start this thread for over two weeks now and I keep forgetting to.

Are there any plural forms of English nouns that you find interesting or noteworthy? Or perhaps just ones that you have to give yourself a mental nudge to get the forms right?

Linguistics aside, I think it's funny to see that our 'man', singular, becomes 'men', plural. Not so hard. But what is funnier is then we have the singular 'specimen' but the plural 'specimens.' Again, Faldage & gang, this is funny to me on a superficial level. And I imagine that it will be fun to take a look at an interesting working list with my kids this fall.

Do any of you have some interesting plural forms that you could note here?

If you've already done this thread way back when, please let me know and I'll delete this one and look elsewhere. But I really would like to know some of the unusual plural forms you've found interesting--on that superficial level.


#109678 08/10/03 01:27 AM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
>Do any of you have some interesting plural forms that you could note here?

Well, I like millennia, which seems to be coming under threat from millenniums. It's not so much a prescriptivist thing (I say forums, not fora), as an aesthetic thing. I just think millennia sounds nicer. A google comparison still gives millennia a huge lead, but the ums are gaining, it seems.


#109679 08/10/03 02:12 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,636
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,636
Hippopotami!!!!

http://www.cartoonstock.com/directory/h/hippopotomi.asp
[note misspelling in link]


#109680 08/10/03 02:17 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Is there a singular for memorabilia?


#109681 08/10/03 10:59 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Memorabilium?


#109682 08/10/03 02:02 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
I'll take your word for it. Is it ever used?


#109683 08/10/03 04:13 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Memorabilium is a backformation from the neuter plural memorabilia. The proper singular is memorabilis. Memorabilium scores about 3:1 over memorabilis on the googlometer. The first 10 hits for memorabilium are all in Latin. Go figure.


#109684 08/10/03 05:40 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Thanks. Has anyone ever said, for ex., that they are going to collect a memorabilium or a memorabilis, though?
WW, I haven't meant to ignore your topic and take over your thread--sorry. Connie took the one I was going to put (pppbbttt to you, C! ), but Faldage's post reminded me of bacillus.


#109685 08/10/03 07:26 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
I would suspect that anyone who said something like, "I got another memorabilium today," would have done so humorously.


#109686 08/10/03 07:27 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Meanwhile, one of my favorite exceptional plurals is monies.


#109687 08/11/03 01:39 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 171
J
member
Offline
member
J
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 171
I don't recall ever seeing it, but I wonder what the plural of pi would look like. If you simply add an "s", you'd have to be very clear you weren't using French.


#109688 08/11/03 02:33 AM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
not to be a spoil-sport or nothin', but isn't pi a unique, singular thing that doesn't take well to pluralization?!


#109689 08/11/03 04:00 AM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
B
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
B
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
I wasn't going to say anything but I just came across this monstrosity:

Technically, the plural is chiasmi, (as with octopus). (http://www.chiasmus.com/whatischiasmus.shtml)

and this thread is too good an opportunity to express my astonishment that anyone who wishes to pontificate to the public at large on linguistic matters could make such a mistake.

Bingley


Bingley
#109690 08/11/03 11:12 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
This man seems a little strange; Gurunet agrees with him on the plural, however. But what they have as an example seems to be what he calls antithesis.


#109691 08/11/03 11:48 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
Anglosaxons seem to be most intrigued by plural forms originating from greek or latin. But if you learn English as a second language, plurals like geese, lice or mice take more effort to memorize. (I am not going to rehash mongoose here..)


#109692 08/11/03 12:52 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,439
W
wow Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,439
One stem of the flower is gladiolus and OED says the plural is gladioluses. BUT
I had an aunt who persisted in using gladioli and pronouncing it Gla-DIE-oh-lie.
We all have eccentric relatives. God knows I try my best to keep up the tradidtion!


#109693 08/11/03 01:17 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Gurunet agrees with him on the plural

Of chiasmus perhaps, but his example of octopus is a little cock-eyed.


#109694 08/11/03 11:10 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 171
J
member
Offline
member
J
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 171
"...isn't pi a unique, singular thing that doesn't take well to pluralization?"

Probably why I can't recall seeing it. But I can conceive of a classroom scenario wherein the math professor might say, "In this equation, you will note that the pis cancel."


#109695 08/12/03 12:21 AM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
W
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
I just checked MW and will paste below what's there. The pi that we think of in math has the plural 'pis,' but another kind of pi, that can also be spelled 'pie' (not the edible pie), has the plural 'pies.'

OK, here's the scoop of pi from MW:

Main Entry: 4pi
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural pis /'pIz/
Etymology: Middle Greek, from Greek pei, of Semitic origin; akin to Hebrew pE pe
Date: 1823
1 : the 16th letter of the Greek alphabet -- see ALPHABET table
2 a : the symbol ð denoting the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter b : the ratio itself : a transcendental number having a value to eight decimal places of 3.14159265


And:

Main Entry: 1pi
Variant(s): also pie /'pI/
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural pies
Etymology: origin unknown
Date: circa 1659
1 : type that is spilled or mixed
2 : a pi character or matrix


So we have two possible plurals for pi, depending upon meaning. Cool, huh?


#109696 08/12/03 01:03 AM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
B
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
B
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
Has there been a revolution in mathematics while I wasn't looking? According to my machine, in ww's citation, pi is represented by the Anglo-saxon eth.

Bingley


Bingley
#109697 08/12/03 01:38 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
1 : type that is spilled or mixed
Yes, that's cool! :-) Yikes--I've heard of alphabet soup, but I've never heard of alphabet pie...

Speaking of oddities--we'd never say, "Have a soup", would we? Is soup technically singular?


#109698 08/12/03 04:06 AM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
B
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
B
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
Technically, unless we are referring to kinds of soup, soup is uncountable, i.e., it has no singular or plural. Uncountable nouns always take a singular verb, have no plural form, never take 'a' or 'an' and, hence the name, cannot be counted 1, 2, 3, etc.

Bingley


Bingley
#109699 08/12/03 08:16 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
we'd never say, "Have a soup", would we? -
Yet someone could say "have a smoke" - and "smoke" is also unlikely to be used in plural.


#109700 08/12/03 09:17 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
never take 'a' or 'an'

Unless they do. Also, they *do take the, as in, "Will you have the soup or the salad?"


#109701 08/12/03 10:00 AM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
>and "smoke" is also unlikely to be used in plural.

You are kidding, right? "Smokes" is more common here than "cigarettes"


#109702 08/12/03 11:17 AM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
W
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
My mother, 72 years old, refers to her cigarettes as her 'smokes.' And a cigarette is certainly easily countable.

However, if you were watching the smoke rise from many smokestacks, say at some sort of factory with many outlets, you'd say something like, "Look at the smoke rising today over there..." Or perhaps, "Look at all the smoke rising today..." But you wouldn't say, "Look at all the smokes rising." :)




#109703 08/12/03 11:35 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
However, if you were watching the smoke rise from many smokestacks, say at some sort of factory with many outlets, you'd say something like, "Look at the smoke rising today over there..." Or perhaps, "Look at all the smoke rising today..." But you wouldn't say, "Look at all the smokes rising." :)

but if, instead of smoke stackes, you were looking at the smokey mist rising from mountains,the you have the Great Smokies!

i think the thing is that the verb smoke-(Do you smoke?/She smokes [/greeen] takes an s, (and do then lends the S to the smoke for a short term for cigarettes, but smoke itself is singular...
we have smokey areas, or smoke filled rooms, but not a room filled with smokes, only a room filled with smokers, each of whom is adding more smoke.


#109704 08/12/03 03:37 PM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Z
Zed Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Z
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
I can see why soup and smoke are uncountable nouns but tell me my deer, why are sheep considered uncountable?!?



#109705 08/12/03 03:39 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
why are sheep considered uncountable?

Because you always fall asleep before you get done.


#109706 08/12/03 06:44 PM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Z
Zed Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Z
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
fall asleep


#109707 08/12/03 06:44 PM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Z
Zed Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Z
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
fall asleep


#109708 08/13/03 01:39 AM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
B
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
B
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
In reply to:

Unless they do. Also, they *do take the, as in, "Will you have the soup or the salad?"


I never said they didn't take 'the'. It might be more precise to say words can have countable and uncountable meanings. Thus soup meaning the edible liquid is uncountable, while if 'soup' means kinds of the liquid or servings of the liquid, then it is countable.

The supermarket sells a wide variety of soups.
Three soups and two salads, please.

Similarly, if 'smoke' means cigarette it is countable. If 'smoke' refers to the vapour given off by burning substances it is not.

Give us a smoke, will you?
Smoke from the forest fires could be seen from many miles away.

Sheep and deer are both countable. It just so happens that the form of the singular and plural are the same.

A sheep (deer) was grazing.
Six sheep (deer) were running across the field.

Bingley



Bingley
#109709 08/13/03 01:55 AM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
B
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
B
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
Wordwind found my post on the chiasmus site needlessly obscure, and asked for an explanation by pm. She thinks my reply might be of general interest and suggested I post it to the board. Here it is:

Sorry, I didn't mean to be obscure. Chiasmi is fine. The problem is the parallel with octopus. Chiasmos is a Greek 2nd declension noun, plural chiasmoi, Latinised and Anglicised as chiasmi. Fine. No problem. Unfortunately pous (foot -- the final element of octopus) is a 3rd declension noun. The plural is podes (think of all the pod words with foot meanings). So if one wants to use the Greek plural it would have to be octopodes. Better by far to treat it as an ordinary English noun -- octopuses.

Bingley


Bingley
#109710 08/13/03 07:03 PM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Z
Zed Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Z
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
far better ... octopuses. Ooh, no I like octopodes better it sounds more octopus movementish to me.


#109711 08/13/03 07:05 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
octopodes

Yeahbut®, is it OCK tuh poads, or ock TAH puh deez?


#109712 08/13/03 07:17 PM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Z
Zed Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Z
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
ock TAH puh deez in the Antipodes but OCK tuh poads elsewhere


#109713 08/13/03 07:22 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
ock TAH puh deez in the Antipodes and also for Euripedes.


#109714 08/13/03 07:23 PM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
Nope, it wouldn't be "ock TAH puh deez" up here, you would have to replace that "AH" with our favourite, (almost our only) vowel, a schwa.


#109715 08/13/03 07:44 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
replace that "AH" with … a schwa

A *stressed schwa!?


#109716 08/13/03 07:53 PM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,230
>A *stressed schwa!?

Sure, up here they're all stressed from being so overworked.

Aks shirley, we're known for rising intonation, and, IMHO, we don't stress that syllable. Having said the word dozens of times in the last few minutes, I'm stil convinced it's a schwa there - the word comes out like "an-tschwa-pscwha-DEEZ.


Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
W
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
Not to change the subject--you all keep schwahing and octopodeaning all you want--but I began to think about sjmaxq's observations on the aesthetic appeal of millennia, and I began to wonder about pandemonium:

So I looked it up on onelook.com. It appears to be a regular old noun. One pandemonium--and I suppose one could be pressed to visit several pandemoniums. There wasn't a single listing of 'pandemonia.' Why not? (I know this is going to be one of those Greek explanations, but please do go ahead.)


Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Google shows 1400 hits on pandemonia but they seem to have other excuses for being* than being the plural of pandemonium. Pandemonium is one of those uncountable thangs. Either it's there or it ain't. It's not even like you'd say there was a pandemonium in the marketplace yesterday. With the one we had in the Forum last week, that's two pandemonia this month alone.

*One hit was a reference to Prehysterical Pogo (in Pandemonia) and there's apparently a computer game Pandemonia. There was also a reference to what may be a goddess named Pandemonia, but that would be feminine singular, not neuter plural.


Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
B
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
B
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
As you say, it doesn't really pluralise very easily. A quick look at Google suggests that pandemoniums is usually an error for pandemonium's.

The word was coined (sounds so much nicer than made up, doesn't it?) by Milton as the name of the city of all demons in his description of Hell in Paradise Lost.

Bingley


Bingley
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
the city of all demons

Of course! [slaps palm to forehead] Very cool, Bingley. Thanks for that.


Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Pandemonium = the city of all demons? Cool! [admiring look e]


Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,636
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,636
Same same in Eric by Terry Pratchett, which, coincidentally, I just started reading last night. My library doesn't have many of the discworld series. Any recommendations? The ones I remember seeing were Reaper Man, Small Gods, Interesting Times, Soul Music, Maskerade, The Last Continent, The Last Hero There may have been a few more but that's all I can remember.


Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Z
Zed Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Z
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
"Guards, Guards, Guards" the City Watch trilogy, and Pyramids. I'm a fan of anyone who can come up with Carpe Jugulum as the family motto of a vampire!


#109724 08/20/03 11:10 PM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Z
Zed Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Z
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Just remembered a personal bug bear. one person, two people. So where did we come up many persons. It has the same numerical sense and Onelook defines it as the formal or legal plural but it lacks the idea of group or inclusiveness that people contains. I hear it more and more in sentances that used to use people or other substitutes eg any persons arriving rather than any people or anyone. It seems to emphasize the separateness of those involved, a cold word to my mind, not used for it's formal meening but as a symptom of the decreasing connectedness we see today. [stepping down of soapbox e]


#109725 08/20/03 11:39 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
They *are different words. Why one should be the plural of the other I don't know. I think historically the term people (fr. Latin populus{singular!}) has connoted a greater degree of unity among its members. Or else people would refer to the group and persons to the individual members of the group.


#109726 08/20/03 11:42 PM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Z
Zed Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Z
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
They are differsnt words Understood, but I still find the change in popular usage an interesting if rather sad reflection of society by its language.


#109727 08/20/03 11:59 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
sad reflection of society

Do you not hear people at all? I should think that limiting the usage of people to mean the group and persons to mean the members of the group would be a useful distinction. I don't know if it is being used that way, but I would rather hear that sort of distinction being made than just accepting the idea that it's one person, two or more people.


#109728 08/21/03 10:31 PM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
Z
Zed Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Z
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,154
I do here "people' but I often here them say persons where I would find people more appropriate. Eg. making a reservation and hearing "How many persons in the party?" I can't think of a specific instance at the moment, unfortunately.
I think if they didn't use the words as interchangable it wouldn't bug me.


#109729 08/22/03 04:54 AM
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
B
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
B
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
I associate the use of persons outside a legal context with speakers/writers from the USA, and somewhat less definitely with attempts to avoid sexist language.

Bingley


Bingley
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692
D
dxb Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
D
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692
Same in Eric by Terry Pratchett, which, coincidentally, I just started reading last night. My library doesn't have many of the discworld series. Any recommendations? ~ consuelo

He has written a lot of discworld books now. Some time since I read it, but I liked 'Small Gods'. The concept of gods competing for worshippers in order to increase their power is maybe not new but he puts some interesting twists in there.


Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,345
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 742 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,547
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,918
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5