Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
#150497 11/21/05 12:13 AM
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,773
D
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
D
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,773
"Crash", btw, has been used as a noun since at least the 16th century. Nouns and adjectives have slopped over each other since before the beginning. Even classical Latin did it.




True, but "crash" denoting the requirement for immediate attention is an adjective, but it is stretched in the other examples to include noun and verb uses. So I would still appreciate an instance where it might be used as an adverb

Last edited by dalehileman; 11/21/05 12:16 AM.

dalehileman
#150498 11/21/05 01:53 AM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 9
stranger
Offline
stranger
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 9
To me, this usage sounds rather like sloppiness and an unwillingness to remember the actual needed verb for the moment. Similar but less appropriate, perhaps, than the current use of the verb "grow" in the phrase "grow your business". Is that evolution of a language, replacing the cumbersome "cause your business to grow", or other possibly more correct phraseology? Or maybe people really do mean simply to throw a bit of fertilizer on the business, hose it down, and hope for a good amount of sunshine...

#150499 11/21/05 06:21 AM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 203
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 203
"I will arrive him."

I think this falls under the category of creative language use, and probably began as a jocose solecism to circumvent the overuse of certain words and expressions. Eventually the joke wore off, but the solecism remained.

I've seen this kind of thing before. When circumstances excessively limit a speaker's lexical palette, the urge for fresh alternatives may break out in open defiance of grammaticality.

It is a deliberate meme of poor grammar which is actually indicative of grammar-conscious language use.

I can't think of any examples off the top of my head, but certainly the same principle is behind the use on message forums of words like "Interweb" (for the much overused word "Internet").

I have seen posters on this forum say "PM me". "Personal message me" is no better that "arrive him." [1]

The ironic corollory of this hypothesis is that the speaker may be in a form of employment below her intellectual station.

Edit : [1] Myself included!

Last edited by Homo Loquens; 11/21/05 06:24 AM.
#150500 11/21/05 07:08 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
"You can have him after I've arrived him." This is because the actor is not the receptionist but the Faldage. - I beg to disagree. The phrase was definitely used as a kind of shorthand for a formal process (sequence of prescribed actions) executed by the receptionist. I think this kind of "language" is not uncommon in the "health sector". It is probably related to the proverbial illegible writing of doctors.

#150501 11/21/05 11:32 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Faldage Offline OP
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Quote:

To me, this usage sounds rather like sloppiness and an unwillingness to remember the actual needed verb for the moment.




Arriving people is a major part of her job description. This is not sloppiness or unwillingness to remember any presumed actual needed verb.

#150502 11/21/05 12:21 PM
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,467
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,467
Quote:

Quote:



Arriving people is a major part of her job description.




Your subject and verb are not in agreement in that sentence.

Ducking and running for cover, probably to no avail, is:


TEd
#150503 11/21/05 01:38 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
descrip that I am, I'm with werner and Faldage on this one. I understood what was meant. don't necessarily like the coinage, but I understood it.


formerly known as etaoin...
#150504 11/21/05 02:31 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Em--it is probably related to filling out forms. Many doctor's offices have "Time of Arrival" on the sign-in sheet. Although I've not heard this particular usage before, to me it's no worse than "enter him", which, esp. if interpreted literally, sounds quite painful! In the latter, I believe everyone understands that it is short for entering his name, and (in the logbook or register) is understood.

In this case, possibly part of the duty once a patient has arrived may encompass other things; for ex., noting payment and/or putting a new form in the front of the patient's file for Reason for Today's Visit, etc. etc. Probably all of these kinds of things are encompassed in the meaning of "arriving" a patient. Mercy--as busy as doctors' offices are, if the staff said, "I have entered his name in the register and completed all the requirements for his arrival process" for every patient, they'd probably lose a whole appointment's worth of time by the end of the week!

#150505 11/21/05 03:03 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,210
yup.


formerly known as etaoin...
#150506 11/21/05 04:11 PM
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,467
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,467
Well, I would much rather be the dear arrived than the dear departed.


TEd
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,351
Members9,182
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Ineffable, ddrinnan, TRIALNERRA, befuddledmind, KILL_YOUR_SUV
9,182 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 775 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,549
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,918
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2024 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5