In reply to:

I love the 'Tigger' answer for 'things that bounce.' Perfectly correct. The problem wasn't with the response; the problem was with the test--and with the test designers' and evaluators' inability to be ntelligent interpreters. There is no reason that 'Tigger' should not have been viewed as an intelligent and correct response.


Yes, I agree, and in fact it irks me a bit that you felt like I needed this explained to me. But, as I have not yet had my morning's coffee, perhaps I will see your kind explanation with a little more humor later in the morning.