Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
Register Log In Wordsmith Talk Forums General Topics Miscellany Chemistry philosophy
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
I think that Davidson is wrong. I don't know why, I just think he is.
other than the fact that you can't have two things physically identical anyway.
maybe, now after reading it several times, I would just say "duh".
sometimes I think philosophers just think too hard.
formerly known as etaoin...
Entire Thread Subject Posted By Posted ![]()
Chemistry philosophy
Jackie 03/04/2003 2:46 AM ![]()
Re: Chemistry philosophy
Buffalo Shrdlu 03/04/2003 3:24 AM ![]()
Re: Chemistry philosophy
Buffalo Shrdlu 03/04/2003 3:25 AM ![]()
Re: Chemistry philosophy
Bingley 03/04/2003 5:40 AM ![]()
Re: Chemistry philosophy
Buffalo Shrdlu 03/04/2003 12:50 PM ![]()
Re: Chemistry philosophy
TheFallibleFiend 03/05/2003 4:38 PM ![]()
Re: Chemistry philosophy
Bingley 03/06/2003 4:42 AM ![]()
Re: Chemistry philosophy
TheFallibleFiend 03/06/2003 4:35 PM ![]()
Re: Supervenience
Faldage 03/04/2003 1:26 PM ![]()
Re: Supervenience
Buffalo Shrdlu 03/04/2003 2:43 PM ![]()
Re: Supervenience
Jackie 03/05/2003 1:08 AM ![]()
Re: Supervenience
wsieber 03/05/2003 9:31 AM ![]()
Re: Supervenience
Jackie 03/05/2003 12:44 PM ![]()
Re: Supervenience
Bean 03/05/2003 12:56 PM ![]()
Re: Supervenience
Faldage 03/05/2003 2:10 PM ![]()
Re: Supervenience
wsieber 03/07/2003 11:53 AM ![]()
Re: Supervenience
Buffalo Shrdlu 03/07/2003 1:50 PM
Moderated by Jackie
Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Rules · Mark All Read Contact Us · Forum Help · Wordsmith Talk