Faldage and Dr Bill

The old Stales index hey!

Thought that had been lost in the annals of AWAD - and only for us old stagers to pay any attention to.

Rather than the mathematically correct, but perhaps somewhat 'cold' definition provided by Faldage, I prefer to think of 10% rather than 0.1. (ie if the number of contributions is greater 10% of the number of looks - then it is a thread worthy of attention for those of us who must discriminate between the things upon which we should spend our time on and those we shouldn't).

Think I also mentioned in the original 'definition' that the threads that fell below the 10% level were often very highbrow.

So Dr Bill, how's it feel to be given a back handed compliment by Faldage? [ducking for cover -e].

BTW, this is the first time I've ever even opened up the Beheading Words Forum. First time for everything huh!

stales