|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803 |
It seems to be a conflation of casus belli and causa belli, both of which are correct, each in its own way.
Causa belli gets only 725 on the Googlometer, but don't tell Juan.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189 |
but don't tell JuanI HEARD THAT! Sure that's not Googlear?Ooph!...that's really going for the juglear!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,624
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,624 |
Well, although I think we've worked out that the likelihood of "google" the verb being included in the OED any time soon is pretty remote, it all kind of begs the question about the continued usage of the word with or without OED sanction. As if the language ever hung around waiting for it. Nearly everyone I know who uses the web talks about "googling" things, even when they're using Yahoo! or one of the other search engines. Even 'er indoors. The fact is, however, that the googlification of the web is not a science and no one (apart from a few hardened sandal-and-beard wearing nerds at Stanford, of course) is trying to turn what is basically just a tool, albeit a very useful one, into a science. So Googlology is a study without students or professors or much of a literature, and is therefore redundant. Don't you like "googlification" as a noun? I do! - Pfranz
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,511 |
I love this!! What's its provenance? Local? Zild?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 11,613 |
Don't you like "googlification" as a noun? Ok, but. Is it pronounced goog-lification, or, more true to the sound of the name, google-ification? If it's the latter, yes, I love it. Google-ification! Google-ification! It can make a wonderful Fantasy vacation! (No applause please, just throw money!)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,065 |
In reply to:
60,000 use hubbub and close to 6,000 use hub-bub...those are the clear facts, the reality...
Actually no. Perhaps those using hub-bub (or indeed hubbub) are more prolific writers, thus artificially boosting their score. Hits = websites not people.
Bingley
Bingley
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189 |
Actually no. Perhaps those using hub-bub (or indeed hubbub) are more prolific writers, thus artificially boosting their score. Hits = websites not people.I think you're right, Bingley. Those befuddled hubbubbers are definitely the more prolific writers...so that settles it then. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692 |
Cross-threading with Jackie, if we name this new democratic process after tsuwm, then we can atsuwm the results are correct and to accept the lower number of hits would be to make a false atsuwmption. Anything could be decided this way, even elections, so instead of an expensively elected prime minister we could have the atsuwmption of Tony Blair.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
Carpal Tunnel
|
OP
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692 |
Mmmm. Astsuwming you're right, then we should also use an s before the t in astsuwm. That's OK. Its estsewntial to get it right.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,430
Members9,182
|
Most Online3,341 Dec 9th, 2011
|
|
0 members (),
610
guests, and
1
robot. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|