Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
Register Log In Wordsmith Talk Forums General Topics Miscellany Anthropic principle
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
A small group of "if"f"s from Scienific American for December 1999:
"Our universe could not have become structured if it were not expanding at a special rate.
If the big bang had produced fewer density fluctuations, the universe would have remained
dark and featureless, with no galaxies or stars. And there are other prerequisites for complexity.
If our universe had more than three spatial dimensions planets could not stay in orbits around
their stars. If gravity were much stronger, it would crush organisms of human size, and stars would
be small and short lived. If nuclear forces were a few percent weaker, only hydrogen would be stable:
there would be no periodic table, no chemistry and no life. On the other hand, if nuclear forces were
slightly stronger, hydrogen itself could not exist.
Entire Thread Subject Posted By Posted ![]()
Anthropic principle
wwh 01/10/2003 2:51 AM ![]()
Post deleted by Wordwind
Wordwind 01/10/2003 7:44 AM ![]()
Re: Anthropic principle
milum 01/10/2003 10:54 AM ![]()
omnipresence
magimaria 01/10/2003 1:50 PM ![]()
Re: omnipresence
wwh 01/10/2003 2:14 PM ![]()
Re: omnipresence
rav 01/10/2003 5:14 PM ![]()
Re: omnipresence
birdfeed 01/14/2003 7:42 PM ![]()
Re: omnipresence
wwh 01/14/2003 7:59 PM ![]()
Re: Anthropic principle
TEd Remington 01/11/2003 2:09 AM ![]()
Re: Anthropic principle
Faldage 01/11/2003 2:21 PM ![]()
Re: Anthropic principle
magimaria 01/11/2003 4:19 PM ![]()
Re: Anthropic principle
wwh 01/18/2003 12:35 AM
Moderated by Jackie
Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Rules · Mark All Read Contact Us · Forum Help · Wordsmith Talk