Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
Register Log In Wordsmith Talk Forums General Topics Wordplay and fun Re: What are we
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
I think it's obvious that we have developed a condition of logorrhea and verbal obstipation on this subject -- it has even reached the point of near logomachy. Part of the problem is that our diverse group, albeit brought together in a common AWADcause, has different verbiases. Some of us are verbivores (voracious consumers of words), some are logo/linguaphiles, others are logomaniacs, and still others are into outright epeolatry (worship of words) -- you know who you are! Having said all that, I believe everyone of us comes to this topic feeling that he (or she) is a logoisseur and thus one who enjoys with discrimination and appreciation the subtleties of words -- therein lies the rubric.
WHAT??
----------------------------------------------------------
Apart from the botanical reference in the title of this post, it sums up what I like about Ayleur. The thing that gives ayleur its deliciosity (if shanks and Blackadder can do it, so can I) is its paradoxical nature. If we all accepted ayleur, it would, by definition, be untrue. By generating such dissent, it is validated. Anyone for a game of Catch?
WHAT???
Good grief, you guys are getting as bad as Shakespeare!
Couldn't understand a word...mumbling into beard...
Entire Thread Subject Posted By Posted ![]()
Re: What are we
belMarduk 10/27/2000 2:28 AM ![]()
Re: What are we
Jackie 10/27/2000 2:46 AM ![]()
Re: What are we
Marty 10/27/2000 2:57 AM ![]()
You're right.
shanks 10/27/2000 9:53 AM ![]()
Re: You're right.
Max Quordlepleen 10/27/2000 10:01 AM ![]()
Re: Ayleur
AnnaStrophic 10/27/2000 11:19 AM ![]()
Re: Ayleur
shanks 10/27/2000 11:44 AM ![]()
Re: Ayleur
Jackie 10/27/2000 4:34 PM ![]()
Re: Ayleur
maverick 10/27/2000 5:31 PM ![]()
Re: Heller's Ayleurs
Max Quordlepleen 10/27/2000 8:05 PM ![]()
Re: Heller's Ayleurs
tsuwm 10/27/2000 8:19 PM ![]()
Re: Ayleur
Jackie 10/28/2000 1:53 AM ![]()
Re: who we are
tsuwm 10/27/2000 5:34 PM ![]()
Re: who we are
Jackie 10/28/2000 1:47 AM ![]()
Re: who we are
Max Quordlepleen 10/28/2000 1:58 AM ![]()
Re: who we are
Jackie 10/28/2000 2:07 AM ![]()
Re: who we are
Max Quordlepleen 10/28/2000 6:13 PM ![]()
Re: who we are
maverick 10/28/2000 6:45 PM ![]()
Re: who we are
Jackie 10/28/2000 7:15 PM ![]()
Re: who we are
jmh 10/28/2000 9:30 PM ![]()
Re: who we are
AnnaStrophic 10/29/2000 1:03 PM ![]()
Re: who we are
wsieber 10/30/2000 6:38 AM ![]()
Re: who we are
Jackie 10/30/2000 1:47 PM ![]()
Re: who we are
shanks 10/30/2000 2:22 PM ![]()
Re: who we are
wsieber 10/31/2000 6:38 AM ![]()
Re: who we are
RhubarbCommando 10/31/2000 4:06 PM ![]()
Re: who we are
maverick 10/31/2000 4:09 PM ![]()
Re: who we are
Jackie 10/31/2000 9:26 PM ![]()
Re: who we are
Bingley 11/01/2000 4:24 AM ![]()
Re: who we are
Wordwind 05/26/2002 1:16 AM ![]()
Re: who we are
FishonaBike 10/31/2000 9:59 PM ![]()
Re: who we are
Jackie 10/31/2000 11:49 PM ![]()
Re: who we are
Bingley 10/30/2000 7:00 AM ![]()
Re: What are we
shanks 10/27/2000 7:19 AM ![]()
Re: What are we
Max Quordlepleen 10/27/2000 9:43 AM ![]()
Re: What are we
shanks 10/27/2000 9:48 AM ![]()
Re: What are we
FishonaBike 10/27/2000 8:26 PM
Moderated by Jackie
Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Rules · Mark All Read Contact Us · Forum Help · Wordsmith Talk