> isn't that Kurt Gödel? as in Gödel, Escher, and Bach?

Spell dyslexia for me there, eation. [sic]

Thanks for the explanation FallibleFiend. I didn't mean to suggest that Kurt proved that 2+2 didn't equal 4, more that, as far as I know, maths was coming to recognize this possibility (or truth?) at about this time.
Can you, at the risk of p-ing off InselPeter, also explain these new theories regarding the speed of light as not being the 'speed limit' for the universe?


The orignality of any idea is directly proportionate to the knowledge of the audience.