Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
Register Log In Wordsmith Talk Forums General Topics Miscellany Saucy Jack
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Just about all of the evidence collected by the Metropolitan Police (London, that is) has been destroyed. What is left is a mass of circumstantial evidence that can be used to prove a wide range of suspects. A lot depends on whether you are prepared to bnelieve that a bunch of prsotitutes gathered enough evidence to blackmail the Royal Family through Prince Albert Victor, Duke of Clarence & Avon (then second in line to the throne - eldest son of the Prince of Wales, who became King Edward VII) Most of the evidence comes via Joseph Sickert, Walter's son, and relies on hearsay, and "remembering" what his father had told him.
As circumstantial evidence, it is pretty powerful stuff - but there is almost no hard evidence to support it.
If you offered it to me as an essay for my course on the Victorian Underworld, you'd get pretty low marks!
EDIT see The Ripper and the Royals, Melvyn Fairclough - (1992)
Entire Thread Subject Posted By Posted ![]()
Saucy Jack
Alex Williams 11/18/2002 6:39 PM ![]()
Re: Saucy Jack
wwh 11/18/2002 6:57 PM ![]()
Re: Saucy Jack
RhubarbCommando 11/18/2002 7:40 PM ![]()
Re: Saucy Jack
Alex Williams 11/18/2002 8:05 PM
Moderated by Jackie
Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics Forums16Topics13,915Posts230,268Members9,208 Most Online4,606
Sep 17th, 2025
Newest Members JerryC, blvd, Tony Hood, Wood Delivery, Forix Richard
9,208 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days) JerryC 1John Fox 1
Top Posters wwh 13,858Faldage 13,803Jackie 11,613wofahulicodoc 11,128tsuwm 10,542LukeJavan8 9,974Buffalo Shrdlu 7,210AnnaStrophic 6,511Wordwind 6,296of troy 5,400
Forum Rules · Mark All Read Contact Us · Forum Help · Wordsmith Talk