Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
#79970 09/09/02 06:46 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Duh!. The first one.

Thanks for the answer to that crucial question!...I've been pondering it for years!





#79971 09/09/02 06:49 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,189
It's not a Catch-22 because that would imply that they were castigated if they *did go out with servicemen and also if they didn't.


So we're looking for a synonymn for, or something similar to, double standard...as in they were "held to a double standard".



#79972 09/09/02 06:52 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Not sure double standard makes it, either. I would infer a double standard to mean that it was OK for, say, men to go out with servicemen, but not for women to go out with servicemen. What we're looking for here is more a "one hand giveth while the other taketh away" kinda thang.


#79973 09/09/02 06:53 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
Damned if you do, and damned if you don't!

yes, its is a classic double standand... women were supposed to befriend and comfort soldiers... but only up to a point... and since the Point is never defined... but is rather based entirely on subjective standards, it make it almost impossible to succeed. and the cost of failure is high. Ain't it grand to be a woman!


#79974 09/09/02 07:07 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
I stick by my earlier post. It's a double standard if one group is allowed to practice a certain behavior but another group is condemned for it. Having an undefined line over which thou shalt not step is not a double standard. It's something totally else.


#79975 09/09/02 07:54 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,400
but both existed.. "good girls" could often get away with behavior that would have a poor girl black listed--

and never forget, until abortion became legal, rich girls never got in trouble... they took vacations to tropical resorts (where abortion was legal.) or they had doctors who were willing to do "d & c"'s... so it was just hushed up..

middle class girls were shipped off to "private schools" or went to visit someone... and reappeared a year later... it was poor girls who didn't have the money to get an abortion or to go off to a "home for girls" who where seen as having 'loose morals' -- and so too with dating.. rich girls often had more private places to meet men/soldiers. poor girls had back alley's... and there was also a general presumption that a lady wouldn't misbehave, and could be trusted.. but poor girls were presumed to be of looser morals! so there was a double standand..

and it still exists.




#79976 09/10/02 04:04 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
F
veteran
Offline
veteran
F
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
What we're looking for here is more a "one hand giveth while the other taketh away" kinda thang.

Almost a backhanded compliment, only consisting of two parts (the complimentary and the offensive).

Nah, not quite right.

I was thinking double bind, but that's more "damned if you do, damned if you don't". Actually, that's it isn't it?


#79977 09/10/02 04:37 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692
D
dxb Offline
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
D
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,692
How about:

Heads you win, tails you lose.

Not the way its usually put, but seems appropriate.


Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,439
W
wow Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
W
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,439
Victory Girls were females who went out about every night, dating a lot of soldiers, sailors Marines, sometimes two or even three dates a night! Some "put out" and some did not. They all had the "patriotic" reason.
Patriotutes were prostitutes who tried to pass themselves off as Victory Girls - the difference was apparent when Patriotutes expected money for services rendered.
Victory Girls were generaly middle or poor class gals (as Helen noted) Some Victory Girls were quite nice average females who even ended up marrying someone they dated. Some Victory Girls also took the time to write notes to many of the servicemen they dated on a "final leave."
There was a story around at the time that prostitutes were complaining about the drop in their incomes because so many "Victory Girls" were giving it away for free!
On another note :
In general, in New England, waitressing is a more respected calling than in other parts of the US. IMHO it's because so many waitresses are college kids (the NE is loaded with colleges in a small area) or they are local folks who would not put up with being treated disrespectfully, nor would restaurant managers take kindly to anyone's "interfering with" a waitress.
I noticed a difference in the way waitresses are treated --and how they respond to unwanted advances or remarks -- in New England and outside New England on my several cross-country car trips.



Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 13,803
I noticed a difference in the way waitresses are treated ... in New England and outside New England

So what you're saying, wow, is

You might be a Yankee if...

...you treat waitresses as though they were human beings.


Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,915
Posts230,053
Members9,198
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
testawad, Bill_L, achz, MAGNVSTALSMA, Burlyfish
9,198 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
1 members (A C Bowden), 293 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,993
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,962
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2025 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5