|
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027 |
I've never thought of adjectives as propaganda! Could you expound a bit? I did not say the adjectives were propaganda, but rather the noun "integrity", which, etymologically, means no more than completeness. It could be said of a complete..anything  . In Horace's time, it was a bit different, since "integer" had a complement: http://www.recmusic.org/lieder/h/horace/cl14.html
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346 |
an acceptable adjectival form of the word "integrity" that uses the same rootHi lori, pleasedta meetya.  I initially skim-read your question and misread it as a request for an adverbial form of "integrity". I quickly came to the conclusion that you wouldn't do anything with integrity except, well, everything. You can act with integrity, but that's about it. Whilst I was barking up the wrong tree on the adverb front, I think my conclusion has some relevance to the adjectival form, and perhaps indicates why "integritous" (amusing as it is) jars somewhat. Integrity is an all-or-nothing quality - regarding a particular person, it applies or it doesn't apply. In response to WW's question, I initially thought that "duplicitous" might be the opposite of "integritous", but having integrity is about much more than just being honest. It's also about being reliable, about completing what has been started (come what may), about keeping promises. So OK, you can stick all the adjectives together - honest, reliable, faithful - and that takes you quite close to a definition of integrity, but it's certainly nothing like 100%. There's something near-mystical (and yes, wsieb, wooly  ) in integrity as wholeness and completeness. IMHO an adjectival form is simply inappropriate for integrity, in that it could't meaningfully be used in the same way as [struggling for a term] standard, lower-level adjectives. For instance: "Joe is more honest than Fred" is OK, but "Joe is more integritous than Fred" isn't, as it implies degrees of integrity. "Joe is (an) integritous (person)" has no advantage over "Joe has integrity" or "Joe acts with integrity". In fact the former has a notable disadvantage in that its meaning springs to mind less readily. - Which is all a roundabout way of saying I don't see a need for an adjectival form of the word. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542 |
shona, I can buy your reasoning with regard to personage, but what about the citations for those odd coinages above; i.e., integrious candor, integritive conduct -- which is to say conducting oneself with integrity. why do you suppose those didn't stick?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3
stranger
|
OP
stranger
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3 |
Interesting insights, FishonaBike. However, I don't really see why we shouldn't have an adjectival form in a single word that means "having integrity" instead of making ourselves turn it into a longer sentence construction whenever a reference to a person's character/actions is made. It would be especially useful if one were speaking of someone having integrity among other qualities in a list format, as in, He was a friendly, sincere, compassionate, integritive (etc) man. This is certainly easier than having to convert the whole phrase or sentence to make the point.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,467
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,467 |
We've touched on this before, tswum. One reason may be that these two words are just plain ugly.
TEd
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542 |
>just plain ugly.
if that were any criterion, we'd hardly be saddled with tinny words like recidivist and spittle.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296 |
Take lori's sentence:
"He was a friendly, sincere, compassionate, integritive (etc) man."
And just make it:
He was a friendly, sincere, compassionate man of integrity."
I don't espcially miss not having the adjective here--if it exists.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 10,542 |
again, harking back to the citations, you have to write, e.g.: To maintain [an integritive] conduct marked by integrity towards our fellow-creatures.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346 |
To maintain [an integritive] conduct marked by integrity towards our fellow-creatures.Or perhaps just "To maintain [ or act with] integrity towards our fellow-creatures", Nunc?  The original context looks a bit flowery to me.
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics13,915
Posts230,007
Members9,198
|
Most Online3,341 Dec 9th, 2011
|
|
0 members (),
455
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|