Welcome to Lori, too.

Rhubarb,

I did NOT mean that well-integrated should be used in the case of a person. Reread what I wrote. I used the area of architecture--well-integrated elements. And I also wrote that perhaps a person's work might be considered to be well-integrated. But I didn't mean at all that we would think of a person as being well-integrated. In fact, I believe I wrote as much.

When I posted again, I wrote that the only adjective form I could think of that used the word integrity itself was well-integrated--but I certainly never meant that it could be applied to a person--as I wrote in my first post.

Harrumph!
WW

Edit: Here's exactly what I wrote, Rubard:

Now when we speak of a person's possessing integrity, that's something a bit different. I don't think I've
ever heard the phrase "well-integrated" applied to a person. Perhaps to a person's work, but not to a
person possessing integrity

See? I agree with you. I would never think of well-integrated being applied to a person. But there's probably some clever exception to this rule out there if we used our imaginations...