Wordsmith.org: the magic of words

Wordsmith Talk

About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us  

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
#7802 10/15/00 08:27 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 347
M
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
M
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 347
Over here we let the chickens sex themselves.

Regardless of whether you meant "themselves" or "one another", belM, if that's how your chickens behave I suspect that your roosters have an identity problem, not to mention their own frustrations.


#7803 10/15/00 11:51 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
F
veteran
Offline
veteran
F
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
a higher ratio of voyeurs at around 8:1 than say YART at 5:1.

How did you suss the ratios out, mav ?

Lots of voyeurs is great stuff, really - means any postings to this thread are being viewed by more people who agree with everything that's being said.

Perhaps we should take the opportunity to advertise something!

Though that is a bit predictable coming under SEX in big letters.





#7804 10/15/00 11:55 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
F
veteran
Offline
veteran
F
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
Were Masters & Johnson more voyeurs than participants?
:-?

(yes the emoticon does sort of work, tsuwm!)


#7805 10/15/00 11:57 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
F
veteran
Offline
veteran
F
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
This really isn't a reply.

Sorry Anna, too late. You're a participant now!




#7806 10/16/00 05:58 AM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
>But I can't help notice this thread has more views than participants - a higher ratio of voyeurs at around 8:1 than say YART at 5:1.<
- Stand up and be counted ! I no longer mind to be counted among voyeurs, though. Isn't it just another word for spectator or observer? Created by those who missed the opportunity?




#7807 10/16/00 01:25 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757
M
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
M
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757
suss the ratios out

Hi Fishy - just a quick look at the summary of hits and replies.

But let me restate the original question, stripped of its jocular notes. Does anyone agree that gender is a useful and appropriate word to describe someone's, well, gender, as sex is an overused word that carries too much baggage?


#7808 10/16/00 04:07 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
F
veteran
Offline
veteran
F
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
..just another word for spectator or observer? Created by those who missed the opportunity?

Yes - created by those who missed the opportunity to watch for those who missed the opportunity to participate!

But if we all got up on the stage, there'd be no audience. So voyeurs all, hold your heads high - the players have no life without you!



#7809 10/16/00 04:15 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
F
veteran
Offline
veteran
F
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
mav, you've probably guessed my opinion:
"Gender" is clearly less ambiguous, but it's also dry and colourless.
"Sex" is better any day!





#7810 10/17/00 01:22 PM
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,027
Getting this thread back up by getting down to the original question: If I correctly remember, the word "gender" was introduced in the context of fighting women's discrimination. Maybe soon we shall realize that this linguistic strategem did not help any, and return to the plain "sex". Remember the thread about minorities and their politically correct designation?


#7811 10/17/00 01:44 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757
M
Carpal Tunnel
OP Offline
Carpal Tunnel
M
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,757
this linguistic strategem did not help any

You may have a point here, wsieber. I recently encountered a discussion on radio that mentioned the way PC language can itself be simlpy subverted. The example offered was the term challenged, originally intended to eliminate the negative connotations of insulting school yard phrases - yet now hurled about with exactly the same glee by monstrous spotty Kevins all over the place! "Oh, dear - Tracy's a bit challenged, yeah!" The point being made was that no PC dyke could hope to hold back the floodwaters of actual meaning - if the intention is to wound, a non-emotive phrase can be invested with just as much poison as an obviously acidic word.

But I still find gender a useful term, even though I like sex in many other places - and is sex ever plain?


Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  Jackie 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums16
Topics13,915
Posts229,911
Members9,197
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
Newest Members
Bill_L, achz, MAGNVSTALSMA, Burlyfish, Renegade98
9,197 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 277 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters(30 Days)
Top Posters
wwh 13,858
Faldage 13,803
Jackie 11,613
wofahulicodoc 10,904
tsuwm 10,542
LukeJavan8 9,948
AnnaStrophic 6,511
Wordwind 6,296
of troy 5,400
Disclaimer: Wordsmith.org is not responsible for views expressed on this site. Use of this forum is at your own risk and liability - you agree to hold Wordsmith.org and its associates harmless as a condition of using it.

Home | Today's Word | Yesterday's Word | Subscribe | FAQ | Archives | Search | Feedback
Wordsmith Talk | Wordsmith Chat

© 1994-2025 Wordsmith

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5