|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 22
stranger
|
OP
stranger
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 22 |
Why would you want to call someone a jerk and not mean it?
Thats funny is it?
Your ability to be condescending exceeds both your ability
argue a rigourous case and on the face of it, to make people laugh.
Your base assumption, despite the abcence of smilleys in my proposition, was that I agreed with it. This is not consistent with the thesis you put forward, and may well therefor be ill founded.
Cheers, Jopo.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 679
addict
|
|
addict
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 679 |
1. I take back all I said about Rubrick fixing the wide post. It was only just a matter of a different browser -- in IE it's still reallllllllly wide.
Thanks, tsuwm. When I originally posted it was slightly wider than the screen width. Now it seems to be inordinately long thanks to jopublic's very mature post of a line of dots.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 679
addict
|
|
addict
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 679 |
May I site your coments as evidence for the proposition?
Wow, jopublic. You write just like this Chicago so-called lawyer I know. Are you related to him?
Do you stay up all night writing your posts or do you just write them when the Chicago Internet cafés are open?
You're a thinker (or so you say). Ponder that.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296
Carpal Tunnel
|
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,296 |
One of them
had read of a study
in which it had been
proven--
as such studies seem
always to be able to prove--
that one could
predict
the average Eye Cue
of the group
by the number of times
EACH member laughed
during a
set time
of intercourse. Dear WW: was this a study by Masters and Johnson?
Dear wwh,
I don't know whose study it was, wwh. I doubt it was Masters and Johnson. Don't think their interest lay primarily with either laughter or Eye Cue.
Test regards,
WW
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 679
addict
|
|
addict
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 679 |
Yeah, get Rube to edit the occasional space into his smiley barricade!
'Tis done. Just that annoying line of dots left between us and a normal width thread.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346
veteran
|
|
veteran
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,346 |
Why would you want to call someone a jerk and not mean it?
Hang on a sec here, Jo - you're a Brit and a Liverpudlian and you're claiming not to understand irony? And also not to know the difference between being genuinely offensive and ribbing close friends?
Guaranteed that either you're on a major wind-up or you're not what you say you are in your profile. Which is it?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 22
stranger
|
|
OP
stranger
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 22 |
Erratum: for adolescent read immature or child like (typified, for example, by the use of 'invisible writing')
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 475
addict
|
|
addict
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 475 |
just turn the damn thread back
to a usable length and stop
pissing about scouse boy
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 679
addict
|
|
addict
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 679 |
Erratum: for adolescent read immature or child like (typified, for example, by the use of 'invisible writing')Here to serve. Jopo.
................................................................................................................Well, this is really mature  Sun just come up over Chicago, faker?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 22
stranger
|
|
OP
stranger
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 22 |
How could I resist such charm and eloquence and I was so pleased to see you did it without the use of even one smiley. Well done. Jopo.
|
|
|
|
Forums16
Topics13,913
Posts229,809
Members9,187
| |
Most Online3,341
Dec 9th, 2011
|
|
|
0 members (),
1,031
guests, and
0
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
