Well, helen, let me just point out that I have been trying to reach you for 4 days, without response. You apparently prefer to rant your views without checking your facts.

Fact 1: If you view those anonymous posts as just wordplay, not as attacks directed at any particular person, I direct you to mav's post today, saying, "Perhaps he needs more of it. [notwink]" (post #56907)

Fact 2: Yes, I certainly did want to know if the anonymous post of "[E.A.]" might be Elizabeth's initials -- as possible aid to indentifying the anonymous poster. Is it your preference that the poster remain unidentified?