Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
Register Log In Wordsmith Talk Forums General Topics Q&A about words SCI'ENCE
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Webster's dictionary is a strange beast to look things up in...it uses biblical and religious quotes as sample sentences, and at least one group seems to think that re-introduction of this dictionary in "homes, church, and school" (see http://www.face.net/Webster's_1828.html) will somehow improve the moral life of the people of the US.
Now, I don't know how widespread this view is - any loony can have a homepage on the Internet, so you can get a slightly warped view of real life if you take every internet page seriously. But it does make me wonder if I can trust the definitions in a dictionary which seems to have some sort of moral agenda - and also happens to be almost 175 years old. BTW, I'd originally found this site by accident when I was just Googling "Webster's Dictionary", trying to find a link to it that I'd lost. It certainly caught me by surprise!
Anyway, maybe it's not the greatest place to get an honest definition of the word "science", of all things.
Entire Thread Subject Posted By Posted ![]()
SCI'ENCE
WhitmanO'Neill 01/14/2002 4:26 AM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
tsuwm 01/14/2002 5:19 AM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
WhitmanO'Neill 01/14/2002 5:46 AM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
Faldage 01/14/2002 11:13 AM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
tsuwm 01/14/2002 4:26 PM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
WhitmanO'Neill 01/14/2002 4:35 PM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
AnnaStrophic 01/14/2002 4:37 PM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
Geoff 01/15/2002 1:19 AM ![]()
knowledge
NicholasW 01/16/2002 1:07 PM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
Jackie 01/14/2002 11:19 AM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
Bean 01/14/2002 11:41 AM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
wwh 01/14/2002 2:29 PM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
Faldage 01/14/2002 2:37 PM ![]()
scientist
NicholasW 01/14/2002 5:02 PM ![]()
Re: scientist
tsuwm 01/14/2002 5:23 PM ![]()
Re: scientist
Faldage 01/14/2002 5:51 PM ![]()
Re: scientist
Jazzoctopus 01/14/2002 6:25 PM ![]()
.
Max Quordlepleen 01/14/2002 7:35 PM ![]()
irrelevant digression
wofahulicodoc 01/15/2002 9:43 PM ![]()
Re: irrelevant digression
tsuwm 01/15/2002 10:09 PM ![]()
.
Max Quordlepleen 01/15/2002 11:05 PM ![]()
Re: irrelevant digression
wofahulicodoc 01/16/2002 1:11 AM ![]()
.
Max Quordlepleen 01/16/2002 1:48 AM ![]()
A lost science?
WhitmanO'Neill 01/16/2002 2:19 AM ![]()
.
Max Quordlepleen 01/16/2002 2:41 AM ![]()
Re: A lost science?
WhitmanO'Neill 01/16/2002 4:08 AM ![]()
Re: A lost science?
Capital Kiwi 01/16/2002 6:23 AM ![]()
.
Max Quordlepleen 01/16/2002 8:08 AM ![]()
Re: A lost science?
Jackie 01/16/2002 11:55 AM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
WhitmanO'Neill 01/14/2002 5:19 PM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
milum 01/15/2002 4:07 PM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
Capital Kiwi 01/15/2002 6:21 PM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
Angel 01/15/2002 7:37 PM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
Faldage 01/15/2002 7:47 PM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
wwh 01/15/2002 8:23 PM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
WhitmanO'Neill 01/15/2002 8:46 PM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
Capital Kiwi 01/15/2002 8:54 PM
Moderated by Jackie
Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Rules · Mark All Read Contact Us · Forum Help · Wordsmith Talk