Wordsmith Talk |
About Us | What's New | Search | Site Map | Contact Us | |||
Register Log In Wordsmith Talk Forums General Topics Q&A about words SCI'ENCE
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
A discussion on another board led me to this, and I thought it might be intriguing to look back upon, and discuss, the semantical evolution of so important a word. Musick, what say ye? And, tsuwm, whence the apostrophe?
From WEBSTER's 1828 DICTIONARY:
SCI'ENCE, n. [L. scientia, from scio, to know.]
1. In a general sense, knowledge, or certain knowledge; the comprehension or understanding of truth or facts by the mind. The science of God must be perfect.
2. In philosophy, a collection of the general principles or leading truths relating to any subject. Pure science, as the mathematics, is built on self-evident truths; but the term science is also applied to other subjects founded on generally acknowledged truths, as metaphysics; or on experiment and observation, as chimistry and natural philosophy; or even to an assemblage of the general principles of an art, as the science of agriculture; the science of navigation. Arts relate to practice, as painting and sculpture.
A principle in science is a rule in art.
3. Art derived from precepts or built on principles.
Science perfects genius.
4. Any art or species of knowledge.
No science doth make known the first principles on which it buildeth.
5. One of the seven liberal branches of knowledge, viz grammar, logic, rhetoric, arithmetic, geometry, astronomy and music.
[Note - Authors have not always been careful to use the terms art and science with due discrimination and precision. Music is an art as well as a science. In general, an art is that which depends on practice or performance, and science that which depends on abstract or speculative principles. The theory of music is a science; the practice of it an art.
Entire Thread Subject Posted By Posted ![]()
SCI'ENCE
WhitmanO'Neill 01/14/2002 4:26 AM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
tsuwm 01/14/2002 5:19 AM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
WhitmanO'Neill 01/14/2002 5:46 AM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
Faldage 01/14/2002 11:13 AM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
tsuwm 01/14/2002 4:26 PM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
WhitmanO'Neill 01/14/2002 4:35 PM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
AnnaStrophic 01/14/2002 4:37 PM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
Geoff 01/15/2002 1:19 AM ![]()
knowledge
NicholasW 01/16/2002 1:07 PM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
Jackie 01/14/2002 11:19 AM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
Bean 01/14/2002 11:41 AM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
wwh 01/14/2002 2:29 PM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
Faldage 01/14/2002 2:37 PM ![]()
scientist
NicholasW 01/14/2002 5:02 PM ![]()
Re: scientist
tsuwm 01/14/2002 5:23 PM ![]()
Re: scientist
Faldage 01/14/2002 5:51 PM ![]()
Re: scientist
Jazzoctopus 01/14/2002 6:25 PM ![]()
.
Max Quordlepleen 01/14/2002 7:35 PM ![]()
irrelevant digression
wofahulicodoc 01/15/2002 9:43 PM ![]()
Re: irrelevant digression
tsuwm 01/15/2002 10:09 PM ![]()
.
Max Quordlepleen 01/15/2002 11:05 PM ![]()
Re: irrelevant digression
wofahulicodoc 01/16/2002 1:11 AM ![]()
.
Max Quordlepleen 01/16/2002 1:48 AM ![]()
A lost science?
WhitmanO'Neill 01/16/2002 2:19 AM ![]()
.
Max Quordlepleen 01/16/2002 2:41 AM ![]()
Re: A lost science?
WhitmanO'Neill 01/16/2002 4:08 AM ![]()
Re: A lost science?
Capital Kiwi 01/16/2002 6:23 AM ![]()
.
Max Quordlepleen 01/16/2002 8:08 AM ![]()
Re: A lost science?
Jackie 01/16/2002 11:55 AM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
WhitmanO'Neill 01/14/2002 5:19 PM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
milum 01/15/2002 4:07 PM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
Capital Kiwi 01/15/2002 6:21 PM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
Angel 01/15/2002 7:37 PM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
Faldage 01/15/2002 7:47 PM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
wwh 01/15/2002 8:23 PM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
WhitmanO'Neill 01/15/2002 8:46 PM ![]()
Re: SCI'ENCE
Capital Kiwi 01/15/2002 8:54 PM
Moderated by Jackie
Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Rules · Mark All Read Contact Us · Forum Help · Wordsmith Talk